Meant as in being lighter than a 585, so what would the selling point be to a 585. Stumpshot suggested l, maybe it was the non auto tune crowdnI think he said.
Good info.
585 is adjustable carb and 85cc. 592 is autotune and 92cc. I can’t imagine more than an ounce or 2 one way or the other between the 2. 592 seems to run better than 7 cc bigger than the 585
Awesome m, makes sense like Steve said for the carb guys and as u mentioned this. I haven't really hear much feedback or anyone running the 585. Was kinda hoping for me. Is seeming quite a few issues on the 592, glad they are being detected early in its development.
If I had to guess I’d say the issues are just about the same between the two but the 592 is just so much more popular. There’s more on the market so there are going to be more problems. Personally, I have only had one get sent back to me and that was a 585 that had a leaky purge bubble or hose
Thanks for the info. Still hoping people will share running experiences, or get 585s on the road to experience
I keep hearing that, but the 125's I've hauled over aren't too bad. Now my ported bgd 056 Mag II would lock up tight before I put dual pawls on it, and even after that if it didn't start in 10 pulls I'd have to take a break. It sucked the rope outta 2 recoils multiple times when I first put it together and left me, my brother, and my dad with wrenched shoulders that evening.
Yea , having both saws I know one is far less than the other, in comparison.
Have you pressure tested the carb?
Good catch , lap it ?View attachment 369434
Brand new carb for a 592. That score is causing a leak path. Won’t hold pressure♂
Can't really blame Husqvarna. Zama maybe?
Walbro issue for sure.
Right.
Thanks Mike. I think they should’ve caught the first carb issue. The saw wouldn’t run straight out the box.
A couple of years ago I lined up 5 562s to port. 2 of them refused to run at all once they were reassembled. They had to have the firmware reinstalled before they would start.
