Who's running 592s and 585s?

[Hinerman]

Agree, all saws are different. Take a ms 201 throttle puzzle, set those parts in front of average person and see how long it takes to have functional saw.

About 2-3 hours. Ask me how I know, LOL...

 

[sawmikaze]

About 2-3 hours. Ask me how I know, LOL...

It tested my patience the first time...

 

[bradb123]

I’m not sure on everyone’s oil problem with them. Mines oils quite well, if it used anymore it’d be out before it runs out of fuel. The 572 carb box is less congested and easier to work on. I’ve had a 28-42” on it and it handles them all fine. I run a 32” with an 8T predominately. I really like the saw overall, I’ve never liked running a 394/395 all that much and for everyday cutting I’d choose the 592 every time over a 395 or 390, and 661’s don’t trip my trigger all that much either

I totally agree with everything you said Mike . The 572/592 saws are so smooth to run ! I've been a heavy duty mechanic for the last 30 years . My circulation in my fingers is poor . I run 3/4'' and 1'' impacts on tracked machines such as dozers and excavators . Vibration is a big deal for me ! The 572/592s are so easy on the hands .

 

[andyshine77]

I totally agree with everything you said Mike . The 572/592 saws are so smooth to run ! I've been a heavy duty mechanic for the last 30 years . My circulation in my fingers is poor . I run 3/4'' and 1'' impacts on tracked machines such as dozers and excavators . Vibration is a big deal for me ! The 572/592s are so easy on the hands .

My hands are in much the same shape, if I run a Sawzall or push mower my hands are numb afterwards. To me all the Spring AV saws are pretty smooth, but the new husky saws are silky.

 

[MG2186]

I totally agree with everything you said Mike . The 572/592 saws are so smooth to run ! I've been a heavy duty mechanic for the last 30 years . My circulation in my fingers is poor . I run 3/4'' and 1'' impacts on tracked machines such as dozers and excavators . Vibration is a big deal for me ! The 572/592s are so easy on the hands .

Me too, I’ve been a mechanic my whole life and my hands and arms can sure tell if the AV is worth a *s-word! Probably why I never liked Stihl’s and really like 500 series Husky’s

 

[Normzilla]

I agree vibration is a big deal. Never thought so young. But it's caught up with me. Hands etc.

 

[TreeLife]

592 starts nice, runs nice, good on fuel even ported. Ive had a 32 and 28 on it. No issues at all.

 

[DC1072]

I still like a good 390xp. Am I crazy to buy a 585 over a 592??? I kinda like the idea of the simplicity of a carb and being able to repair yourself easy. But less than $100 difference between the 2??? Hmm. Crazy I am maybe.

Give you a heads up my 592 in my hands feels like the 390 same feeling.
And it has good power to weight ratio

 

[DC1072]

I’m not sure on everyone’s oil problem with them. Mines oils quite well, if it used anymore it’d be out before it runs out of fuel. The 572 carb box is less congested and easier to work on. I’ve had a 28-42” on it and it handles them all fine. I run a 32” with an 8T predominately. I really like the saw overall, I’ve never liked running a 394/395 all that much and for everyday cutting I’d choose the 592 every time over a 395 or 390, and 661’s don’t trip my trigger all that much either

I had a 42 on mine it oiled well too. I did get a chance to hook it up to the Husqvarna software. And I did have a computer issue with the carburetor Solenoid have to replace it I believe. The mechanic is waiting on husky to get back to him.
I’ve complained about some issues with starting with it and that is why.

 

[andyshine77]

I had a 42 on mine it oiled well too. I did get a chance to hook it up to the Husqvarna software. And I did have a computer issue with the carburetor Solenoid have to replace it I believe. The mechanic is waiting on husky to get back to him.
I’ve complained about some issues with starting with it and that is why.

How was it behaving?

 

[DC1072]

How was it behaving?

Good example is it sat for one month. It took me over 15 poles to get it started. My 572 same thing sat for that long time. It only talk 4 pulls 2 pop after pop I reset the choke and two pulls to start.
And it was the same back in cold temperatures it would take so many more pulls to get it to fire over.

 

[MG2186]

I had a 42 on mine it oiled well too. I did get a chance to hook it up to the Husqvarna software. And I did have a computer issue with the carburetor Solenoid have to replace it I believe. The mechanic is waiting on husky to get back to him.
I’ve complained about some issues with starting with it and that is why.

I should get mine hooked up once and see, when I first got it, it’d start 2 pulls no matter what. But here lately it’s a little more finicky. My 572 has started the same since day 1.

 

[Matt Schmitt]

I’ve got a 572 that’s kinda funky to start will pop off no problem but takes 1-6 more pulls to fire and stay running. I actually thought it was a fuel line as the primer bulb didn’t seem like a lot of resistance but maybe it’s similar issue. It’s the only autotune I’ve ever had that has this start issue, the others are always 2-4 pulls no matter how long they’ve sat.

 

[DC1072]

I’ve got a 572 that’s kinda funky to start will pop off no problem but takes 1-6 more pulls to fire and stay running. I actually thought it was a fuel line as the primer bulb didn’t seem like a lot of resistance but maybe it’s similar issue. It’s the only autotune I’ve ever had that has this start issue the others are always 2-4 pulls no matter how long they’ve sat.

My suggestion is. It will not hurt to get it hooked up to the computer. I have four auto tune saws. And a 592 was behaving totally different. I was kind of glad to hear that the Saw had a problem. Age of technology. Now I don’t seem so crazy to myself.

 

[Matt Schmitt]

Might have to do that.

 

[Squareground3691]

Might have to do that.

Any issues ?

 

[whitesnake]

Give you a heads up my 592 in my hands feels like the 390 same feeling.
And it has good power to weight ratio

So your saying the 390xp is still better?

 

[MG2186]

So your saying the 390xp is still better?

Not even close to being better, A 592 is quite an improvement over a 390, IMO

 

[DC1072]

So your saying the 390xp is still better?

No I’m saying that the 592 in my hands feels like to 390. But the 592 has much more power. I don’t have to worry about tuning the carburetor either.

 

[TreeLife]

Thr 592 feels to me...like a 395 lite. Randy did an excellent job, it utilizes a 32 in hardwood easily. Sounds kickazz too.