High Quality Chainsaw Bars Husqvarna Toys Hockfire Saws

592XP info and a surprise

CR888

Here For The Long Haul!
Local time
5:50 AM
User ID
452
Joined
Jan 9, 2016
Messages
2,622
Reaction score
10,583
Location
Australia
Country flag
I thought Andy's 592 ran pretty good considering it just came out a box. The earlier videos made me feel the 592 lacked 90cc torque. I wouldn't hesitate to buy a 572/592. But given the fact the 395 is really a 100cc chassis saw and may be the last available my next present to myself will be a new 395xpg (hopefully g). And it will remain in a box unfueled with its original scrench for years to come.
 

andyshine77

Pinnacle OPE Member
Local time
3:50 PM
User ID
3830
Joined
Aug 17, 2017
Messages
1,254
Reaction score
5,632
Location
Cincinnati, OH
Country flag
And I have the opposite experience. My 572 will oil a 32 plenty. Every stihl newer than my old ms460, I felt like, oiled like crap.
Odd. The 660, 440 and 460 had weak oil output without upgrading the control bolt and piston to the HO parts. The 3 series were always better than those saws. The 572 is iffy with a 28" bar. But then again, I cut a lot of crazy dry Ash that sucks up bar oil like $.50 prostitute.[emoji1787]

The current Stihl models are way better IMHO than the old non HO pump on the old 660, 460 and 440.
 
Last edited:

andyshine77

Pinnacle OPE Member
Local time
3:50 PM
User ID
3830
Joined
Aug 17, 2017
Messages
1,254
Reaction score
5,632
Location
Cincinnati, OH
Country flag
I thought Andy's 592 ran pretty good considering it just came out a box. The earlier videos made me feel the 592 lacked 90cc torque. I wouldn't hesitate to buy a 572/592. But given the fact the 395 is really a 100cc chassis saw and may be the last available my next present to myself will be a new 395xpg (hopefully g). And it will remain in a box unfueled with its original scrench for years to come.
I can safely say the 592 does not lack torque, not one bit. I'm actually leaning toward it being the strongest saw out of the box I've ran, you can lean on it all you want. That log is stone hard and it was still frozen. I've had a few 880's, 3120's that felt so choked up out of the box that it was sad. I can say the transfer tunnels are huge looking.

It's early, very early, but I think this saw will be more successful than the 572xp, it doesn't feel that much heavier or larger, yet light-years more power. I've always felt the 572 was a bit sluggish, even after a lot of fuel. Both have similar rugged design philosophies.

I have a 661 her to compare against the 592. I'm just waiting for the weather to warm up just a bit.
 

huskyboy

Sorta a husqvarna guy...
Local time
3:50 PM
User ID
1352
Joined
May 30, 2016
Messages
10,025
Reaction score
43,469
Location
Ct
Country flag
@andyshine77 does the 592 hold more fuel/oil than the 661? That was one of my dislikes about the 661 when I ran it, I thought it didn’t hold quite enough fluids for a 90cc saw. Runtimes were rather short per each tank.
 

~WBF

Thecallofthewildanswered1989-2017[PAID IN FULL!]
Local time
8:50 PM
User ID
9014
Joined
Mar 15, 2019
Messages
667
Reaction score
2,424
Location
Uk
I like the 462 up to 28" after that, I'd grab a bigger saw. And yes, the 462 will pull a 32", but I agree that's pushing it in hardwood. The oilers, well I'm actually not a fan of the oil output on the 572, the 462 and 500i do better with the pin pushed in. That's my experience anyway.
Maybe it's not putting out what it should. That saw is said to put out 22 ml per minute at max. Maths says it's empty at 18.5 minutes.?
 

DC1072

Pinnacle OPE Member
Local time
3:50 PM
User ID
15891
Joined
Mar 6, 2021
Messages
492
Reaction score
1,259
Location
South Carolina
Country flag
My 572 oil the bar good and a 32 inch bar good. Now my 660 a 36 inch bar dozen oil well. First time using the bar in oak the paint off the bottom bunt the bar Turn over about bunt paint off the other Side(stihl Light weight bar)
The old heavyweight 36 didn’t have much problem with that.
 

MG2186

Pinnacle OPE Member
Local time
2:50 PM
User ID
389
Joined
Jan 3, 2016
Messages
2,059
Reaction score
7,893
Location
Summer,IA
Country flag
My 572 oils the 28 and 32 as good as my 2171’s. It’s about empty with a tank of fuel. All I cut is dry dead ash as well. I actually though it ran quite well in stock form with just a muffler mod. To each and their own I guess
 

andyshine77

Pinnacle OPE Member
Local time
3:50 PM
User ID
3830
Joined
Aug 17, 2017
Messages
1,254
Reaction score
5,632
Location
Cincinnati, OH
Country flag
Maybe it's not putting out what it should. That saw is said to put out 22 ml per minute at max. Maths says it's empty at 18.5 minutes.?
I thought that may be the same, o even replace the oiler, same deal. Others have complained saw well, so I don't know.
 

andyshine77

Pinnacle OPE Member
Local time
3:50 PM
User ID
3830
Joined
Aug 17, 2017
Messages
1,254
Reaction score
5,632
Location
Cincinnati, OH
Country flag
My 572 oils the 28 and 32 as good as my 2171’s. It’s about empty with a tank of fuel. All I cut is dry dead ash as well. I actually though it ran quite well in stock form with just a muffler mod. To each and their own I guess
Part of it is my experience with saws like the 7900, and other ported saw, a guy can get a bit jaded overtime. The 572 definitely has more snot than any stock 372 ever did.
 

MG2186

Pinnacle OPE Member
Local time
2:50 PM
User ID
389
Joined
Jan 3, 2016
Messages
2,059
Reaction score
7,893
Location
Summer,IA
Country flag
Part of it is my experience with saws like the 7900, and other ported saw, a guy can get a bit jaded overtime. The 572 definitely has more snot than any stock 372 ever did.
Agreed! Mines ported and runs real well but it don’t have the nasty feel of my 2171’s. I still like running it more than them though even though it’s a little slower and heavier. It’s so smooth, really like the auto tune and is better on fuel. Thus the reason for me wanting a 592. I’ve ran 395’s and never cared for them even though they’re a beast. When I ran the 592 Kevin had at the MN firewood cut I knew I wanted one. It felt more like a 390 than a 395 as far as weight and feel.
 

DC1072

Pinnacle OPE Member
Local time
3:50 PM
User ID
15891
Joined
Mar 6, 2021
Messages
492
Reaction score
1,259
Location
South Carolina
Country flag
Agreed! Mines ported and runs real well but it don’t have the nasty feel of my 2171’s. I still like running it more than them though even though it’s a little slower and heavier. It’s so smooth, really like the auto tune and is better on fuel. Thus the reason for me wanting a 592. I’ve ran 395’s and never cared for them even though they’re a beast. When I ran the 592 Kevin had at the MN firewood cut I knew I wanted one. It felt more like a 390 than a 395 as far as weight and feel.
That’s exactly the way I feel that it feels more like 390 it feels good in the hands
 

logger nate

Super OPE Member
Local time
1:50 PM
User ID
11746
Joined
Feb 16, 2020
Messages
145
Reaction score
1,884
Location
Idaho
The king is whichever one you like the most. Whatever feels the most comfortable when using it. The one that fits your needs.
Specs on paper and timed cuts I thought I would prefer the 462 but after using it and 572 for a few months I found I much preferred the 572. 592 looks like it’s going to be a great saw, hope I can try one out soon.
 
Top