looks like you've come over to the dark side Kenis.
looks like you've come over to the dark side Kenis.
I have a MM ported 661 Iam not totally sold on mtronic
I swapped a cylinder from a non mtronic 661 to a new mtronic 661.There are a couple guys that have converted them, and they look to be more Beastly with the mechanical carbs.
Silly Yermans.
I'm pro m-tronic...
Sent from my iStump using Tapatalk
I've yet to see two identically setup saws (one m-tronic vs. non) have a faster torquier cut in original form.
Sent from my iStump using Tapatalk
It is not just that one ,all Husky's are ugly .
....
Maybe I'll get them dynoed at the upcoming GTG. I honestly don't know which one runs stronger, I like em both!
If more or less self made and uncertified dynos start popping up, I will be extremely skeptical - there is no "like" for such a thing.
Niko,
This one looks like it was done right, and there are already some "baseline" saws to use for comparison. IMO, the actual #s don't mean a lot, but the relation to other saws tested the same day, under the same conditions, with the same equipment will provide more relevance than anything else we do.
Heck, two guys run the same saw and get widely different cut times!
Good to see you posting, hope you are doing well.
MustangMike
Even if the dyno is not properly calibrated to exact specs, it can still be useful in telling which saw among a group is producing most power. ....
.