Yeah that’s not gonna get it done.Pics taken from another group I’m in (not mine). Looks like they need to make a smaller file for when you get back far on the cutter. I wouldn’t cut with that.
View attachment 323473 View attachment 323474
It is not for the easily aroused and Your horny meter is already kinda twitchy!![]()
Nice Tim. You take that saw out of the museum for this test? Lol Just kidding. Could you post pics of the cutters on both chains??? Close ups.
Both cutters look good sir. I was just funnin ya aboot that cool saw...lol
Ya that looks tricky. Looks like they need to hog out the gullet as far as you can. With a little lay file. Down to the tye straps to get that corner down on the cutter. In the pic it looks like they can take the gullet down a bitPics taken from another group I’m in (not mine). Looks like they need to make a smaller file for when you get back far on the cutter. I wouldn’t cut with that.
View attachment 323473 View attachment 323474
Yup. I wrote a reply before I saw this. HaApparently it can work if you file down into the drive link a bit. The comments for this pic are in a different language.
View attachment 323492
Nice looks good man. I like the way it cuts especially on big double cut trees here out west. Nice test.Here's my take on the Bryan Marks "Hexa" filed chain vs a round filed chain. Well worth the try.
Thanks Bryan!
Although the round filed chain cut a hair faster the "Hexa", the "Hexa" was extremely smooth and pulled very hard.
The chips looked about the same from both chains.
I need to play with it a little more when I can get one decent logs to test with.
Nice looks good man. I like the way it cuts especially on big double cut trees here out west. Nice test.
How much are theyMight as well use a Goofy file