Woodslasher
Teh debil
- Local time
- 12:41 PM
- User ID
- 15993
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2021
- Messages
- 3,482
- Reaction score
- 14,156
- Location
- Commiefornia
This is all speculation, fyi. East coast trees tend to be hard(er)woods which tend to be slower growing, so if they are logged with the same frequency as West coast trees their average size will be smaller. Also, the West is a more recent “discovery” so the chance of there being untouched sections of forest is greater.Just the species of trees?
Plus, back when the US was first discovered, huge, West-coast sized trees did exist on the East coast, but they were all cut down for either building materials, coal production, farm clearing, firewood, etc, long long ago.
Since they were cut down so very long ago and there aren’t really traces of their existence, no one remembers them. Since the discovery of the West coast giants wasn’t so very long ago and the gov’t saved some, knowledge of their existence is more widespread.