My MS260 with the large carb will run on 92 octane gas but the saw will almost always act like a dog that sneezes on their food and pees on it if they don’t like it.
That gas ends up being fed to my 1968 JD 140 lawn tractor which will run even on stale gas.
So I’ve continued to run 87 gas since for all my saws.
I would suggest that you not consider the two conditions above as connected. I mean, they are, but changing fuels is just like heading up the mountain to cut. The saw will react differently given different conditions.I recently got some vp110 in order to get away from ethanol. I didn't immediately notice a power loss in my MMWS 6100, but I noticed unburnt fuel/oil mess coming out of the muffler. After talking to @Benwa I checked the plug, rich. Had prev been tuned in wood. I also noticed I was filing depth gauges down and pushing harder to keep from 4 stroking. I was kinda distracted from the fuel thing by the chain sharpening to go faster learning thing. So I put some TruFuel premix in it. No re-tuning. Wow, woke it right up and started to clean up the plug. I think Tru is 91. I had read somewhere in the past that someone with a dyno went richer and richer on oil mix, tuning as they went, and made more power down to 18:1. My theory is more oil burning longer makes more power, and the remaining unburnt oil seals rings better.
Which brings me to my two questions - would 87 with lots of oil make more power? the 87 lighting easy (kindling) to get the oil (hardwood) going?
AND - if I retune leaner=hotter with the 110, will it run better?
Thanks!
I recently got some vp110 in order to get away from ethanol. I didn't immediately notice a power loss in my MMWS 6100, but I noticed unburnt fuel/oil mess coming out of the muffler. After talking to @Benwa I checked the plug, rich. Had prev been tuned in wood. I also noticed I was filing depth gauges down and pushing harder to keep from 4 stroking. I was kinda distracted from the fuel thing by the chain sharpening to go faster learning thing. So I put some TruFuel premix in it. No re-tuning. Wow, woke it right up and started to clean up the plug. I think Tru is 91. I had read somewhere in the past that someone with a dyno went richer and richer on oil mix, tuning as they went, and made more power down to 18:1. My theory is more oil burning longer makes more power, and the remaining unburnt oil seals rings better.
Which brings me to my two questions - would 87 with lots of oil make more power? the 87 lighting easy (kindling) to get the oil (hardwood) going?
AND - if I retune leaner=hotter with the 110, will it run better?
Thanks!
The lowest octane fuel that you can run without detonation will yield the most power.
For me the HP numbers are not most important thing. I bet 1000€ that a dyno at the Stihl / husqvarna factory will show other numbers. So u can only compare the numbers from this dyno.Wow ... Over 7.2 Hp from a muff modded 462 ... I knew I liked them saws!!! And porting adds even more!
Why?
Flame/combustion speed does not relate to octane rating.
Of course it might just be true with some pump gas, but that does not make it true overall.
I will 2nd thisThe lowest octane fuel that you can run without detonation will yield the most power. Higher octane fuels allow you to run higher compression and further advanced ignition timing to produce more power. Oil mixture depends on the oil and type of fuel, methanol takes a lot more oil due to the solvent effect of the alcohol. Mostly the power gained from a richer oil ratio is from less friction, lower operating temperature, and better ring seal.
So...since we can't hear detonation in 2smokes, 92 or 87? Husky n steel say 89...
I've heard it in a stock 2188. It was a subtle sound that I wasn't sure about. It went away with 93 octane, 89 mid grade wasn't enough. The same goes for the Volvo I drive. Under enough load at certain rpm it sizzles, but it takes premium to make it stop, and there's a noticeable power increase and 3-5mpg increase.So...since we can't hear detonation in 2smokes, 92 or 87? Husky n steel say 89...