TJ the Chainsaw Mechanic
Old Homelites rule!
- Local time
- 7:29 AM
- User ID
- 433
- Joined
- Jan 7, 2016
- Messages
- 4,629
- Reaction score
- 8,974
- Location
- Next to my bench at the shop, Oregon
lol you one funny manFixed it for ya![]()
lol you one funny manFixed it for ya![]()
Dude, I am with you on this! Husky filtration for the win, woot woot!288 high top! Happiness is never having to tap out an air filter.
I bought my first two 064's brand new when they were first introduced in 1986.
One with heated handles for winter the other for summer.
Their owner manuals says 14.1 lbs and there wasn't a 288XP introduced until over 2 years later. The 288 was 2 lbs heavier BTW. Swinging an extra 2 lbs 8 hour a day 5 days a week adds up.
Loved my 064's, by 1988 when the first 2 were retired I ported one heavily and ran a 084 carb on it.
Ran it in many a competition across the country, summer of 88 I gave Ron Hartill (7 time Hayward World champ) a good run in the cold start 3 cut 16" pine on Vancouver Island with my 064 against his 100cc Poulan Pro 665 .
Not sure if the 288 ever got air injection in the 1990's but it didn't have it when it was introduced in 1988.288 high top! Happiness is never having to tap out an air filter.
While on the subject of air filter quick access, the outdated 288XP had 3 screws to loosen with a scrench to remove the top cover to get at the air filter.
The 064 just a nice simple single knob to loosen with the fingers.
Cant like this post bc of the "outdated 288" part.See the thing is the 288 didn't need quick filter access cause it doesnt get nowhere near as dirty as a Stihl (anything) in the same amount of time. Instead of Stihl addressing their poor filtration 30 years ago..... they just made it fast an easy to get to the filter.
![]()
Yeah maybe I was a little harsh about the "outdated" comment. Even the introduced in 1993 272XP still had the same 3 screw top cover.Cant like this post bc of the "outdated 288" part.See the thing is the 288 didn't need quick filter access cause it doesnt get nowhere near as dirty as a Stihl (anything) in the same amount of time. Instead of Stihl addressing their poor filtration 30 years ago..... they just made it fast an easy to get to the filter.
![]()
Great perspective on both saws, thanks for sharing.Lent my 288 to a mate who used till all the screws fell out, carb, top cover, big av spring, *f-word knows what he was doing with itit's due a full going over now, well, it's on the list anyway
Anyway, time passes and another mate gave me a rebuilt Cross 064, like it a lot, lighter, works well, good felling limbing logging saw. Usual stihl refinements of proper tensioner, inboard clutch, obedient screws
Power wise the 288 is great, didn't mind cutting hardwood with depth gauges set to softwood on a 24", big balls, heavy though lumping it around rough ground which I did a fair bit of, my favourite big husky tho haven't run a 181 or 385
And it just sounds epic
All my saws are ported. Ive had both. I still have the 288. Had 2 064s both minty. I didn't like the vibes of the 064. Both mine made my hands tingle after only a few minutes. Put the 064 up and brought out the 288 for the rest of the day. No more tingle. The sound of the 288 for me- does it. I asked 3 other members that like me have had a absolute slew of saws- stock and ported if they would pick a 461 or a mint 064 for the same amount of money. Every single one of them picked the 461. Parts, Comfort, AV. Slight nod to the 064 for power, but the 461 is so much less fatiguing to use for extended period bc of springs. I think AV makes a huge factor between the 288 and 064.
Honestly, I can't remember Ryan. I have had SO many saws. I know for sure I ran the last one I had and it was a mint rebuilt saw I had Randy go all the way through. I wound up trading it to him bc of the vibes. He later sold it.
That's where it needs to stay.
No cake for youThat's where it needs to stay.![]()