Nothing against this build thread or anything or anyone in it, I would like to share a conversation I had just the other day and you folks can decide for yourselves what if anything to take from it as I can make no claim to it. On a current build I was going over some options with the owner one of which happened to be the piston pin. Seeing as a quick revving saw was part of the goal, I mentioned having a smaller inner diameter pin that would reduce weight. This was quickly rejected and rebutted and the heaviest pin was asked to be put in the saw. I asked why, as this was contrary to the goal it seemed to me. The response was that the weight was not a concern as much as the pin needed to be a good heat sink to help keep the piston and bearing cool with the extra stresses and heat from turning the engine into a high performance one.
So I've been rolling this around in my pea brain when the discussion turned up here. Surely there is more to think about as in this case a larger piston than stock being used changes that whole dynamic, but will be something to consider for myself into the future as there are lots of things to contemplate when messing around trying to make a saw run betterer than it was designed to. Seeing that Stihl switched to a larger pin diameter only bolsters this thought. Even though I do like the idea of new parts technology coming along to help us along the way. As always the open discussion here at ope with everyone's input of knowledge will eventually win the day, having separated the wheat from the chaff, of what works. Which gives me the confidence to keep trying new things, as even if I fail, I'll have learned what not to do.