Yes and no, the brake is 65% activated, but not at 65% capacity, it’s controlled braking power is somewhere around the square of percentage applied voltage, also linearly increasing with rpm.
This 100 amp alternators successfully braked a TM661, I think the excitation voltage was a title higher, but it really brings the load on at 10+ volts excitation to the alternator.
I do have a 180A alternator to fit, I think this might be needed for high torque low rpm saws, I’m not sure if it would regulate the entire power band of a CS1201 or Stihl 090 as it sits, peak power yes, maybe not down to clutch slippage.
Careful with your water excitation bubI need to step up my water supply to deal with those high tq low rpm saws.
How about dyno testing how much power is lost when a saw gets hot.
Makes me wonder how much power my XS7900 makes, it peaks between 11k & 12k.
Have you every dynoed a cs400?
Have you ever run a 7900 stock coil vs doing the unlimited 272 coil to see if there is any power gain or loss or just let's you rev the piss out of it? Or see if the power band changes at all?
I think it depends on which coil is on it stock. 64xx saws converted with the 13.5 coil don’t bother me a bit, but I don’t like the 12.8 coils at all, too low imo!No, I haven't. I have seen good power from limited and unlimited ported saws though. Unless going all out I don't think it is worth the hassle.
Joe can simulate extended run times if his water supply is good...effectively working, loading, and heat soaking the saw.How about dyno testing how much power is lost when a saw gets hot. Dyno a saw on the cooler side, then put a good 5min of firewood cutting on it, hook it up to the dyno, and make a 1-2min pull (if the dyno can handle that, or keep it on the full 5 min if it can), then a data acquiring run immediately after. Just to simulate working conditions vs a cookie cutting video. I made a work demo video of a 590 once, and noticed it took a solid 3min of cutting firewood to get it warmed up, then a few more minutes to get it hot. That was almost non stop cutting, but I can't say I noticed much difference in power. Maybe a 10% drop if even that.
I think it depends on which coil is on it stock. 64xx saws converted with the 13.5 coil don’t bother me a bit, but I don’t like the 12.8 coils at all, too low imo!
Awesome work Joe, very, very interesting, especially to me. If you remember, you dynoed my DCS6401 (with a 7910 top end) back in March last year after Kevin @huskihl ported it - we tried it with and without the Poleman modified carb? This is before it got sent all the way out to NZ
How about dyno testing how much power is lost when a saw gets hot. Dyno a saw on the cooler side, then put a good 5min of firewood cutting on it, hook it up to the dyno, and make a 1-2min pull (if the dyno can handle that, or keep it on the full 5 min if it can), then a data acquiring run immediately after. Just to simulate working conditions vs a cookie cutting video. I made a work demo video of a 590 once, and noticed it took a solid 3min of cutting firewood to get it warmed up, then a few more minutes to get it hot. That was almost non stop cutting, but I can't say I noticed much difference in power. Maybe a 10% drop if even that.