- Local time
- 2:00 PM
- User ID
- 21
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2015
- Messages
- 5,336
- Reaction score
- 28,481
- Location
- In a meeting

Yes it isIs that 372 ported?
Yes it isIs that 372 ported?
My 372's just hang from a rafter now ............. never thought that would happen
I mean I still like a 272. No love?
Could have worse problems brother!Love my Stump/Master 272xp? Always, plus I get to remember the help Randy gave me building it when I had/knew so little. Much like siblings however, the newest baby gets all the attention. First a 266xp came and joined it, then a SSS 044, a Pro Mac 700 and CFB hybrid came along. Now a minty TM 044(the new precious) and a brand new TM 461 join the fleet, along with a coming soon XS 7310. A 372xpXT/365 Special under construction and builder saws MS460 and 575xpg waiting in the wings.
So basically, I have a 70cc saw problem... which one to use.
Could have worse problems brother!
Nah never even ran a ported 272. There’s plenty of faster saws I just dig em. I can work on them myself pretty quickly and easily. (Have a 346 torn down I’ll likely never get back together).272 had its day ........... have you ran a ported 462, or a ported 500i ?
My 372's just hang from a rafter now ............. never thought that would happen
A 20" bar on a ported 70cc saw is fun!My favourite is 572xp, running a 20" with c85, its a little animal.
View attachment 313993 View attachment 313994
Nah never even ran a ported 272. There’s plenty of faster saws I just dig em. I can work on them myself pretty quickly and easily. (Have a 346 torn down I’ll likely never get back together).
Pretty reliable. Can’t explain it. Just dig em
It may equal out with the added power, and how much extra fuel they actually burn, which I can't see being more than a few ounces per gallon. If that was a concern I'd be running a 462, low weight, excellent fuel economy and plenty of power IMHO.[emoji111]Don’t get me wrong the 500i and 7900 are crazy good power to weight and lite for what they are. But you have to carry more gas for them so whose really carrying less weight at end of the day?
Definitely a good option for the stihl guys and anyone running shorter bar lengths.It may equal out with the added power, and how much extra fuel they actually burn, which I can't see being more than a few ounces per gallon. If that was a concern I'd be running a 462, low weight, excellent fuel economy and plenty of power IMHO.[emoji111]