Way go to 42:1 if you're looking for maximum lubrication in the lower end? Performance lowered? To much buildup of deposits?
Detonation because of the longer stroke and time . Something we dont have on a saw
More oil thans needed in my opinion with kl200 at 32to1 in a saw. Probably run 50to1 easily. I think 42to1 will be a happy medium with performance and protection
I didn't retune since the rpms were so close and both cleaned-up well in the cut. A retune may have ended in a different conclusion.
You can theorize all day. Testing, like you did previous, will give you an answer. Wasn't 87 the slowest in your ported 362?
If it's not pinging on 89, then timing was prob set with 91 and it will run better because it's set up that way. But I'm thinking it wouldn't like the 89 with the compression that motor has...
Very interesting...[emoji106]
Oh I thought you said it would run on 89. This makes more sense. High compression.
Test performance with several timed cuts by comparing 32:1 vs 42:1 vs 50:1. That will answer your question.
Goggle octane ratings and what compression ratio is needed to require high octane fuel. Next we dont have a clue what our compression ratio is in these saws to be able to use a chart
Why would "to much" oil in the lower-end not be beneficial? And, what is "to much" oil? I understand if you're seeing a dry lower-end isn't good.
Don't make it complicated. Test in wood for your answer.
You and Redbull's tests proved that wrong. 87 was the slowest.
Pooling in the bottom and getting fuel in the bottom will start washing the bearings instead of lubricating and also too much may create drag
I'm interested in your results.Just got this in the mail today!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
He is gonna tell u the same as everyone else . Low octane= more power, klotz is some of the best oil he has used, and there is suppose to be carbon on the piston!!!
Your theory or someone else? Test 32:1 vs 42:1 and see if 32:1 is slower by creating drag.
Why was 87 the slowest in your and Redbull's test? Define "best"?He is gonna tell u the same as everyone else . Low octane= more power, klotz is some of the best oil he has used, and there is suppose to be carbon on the piston!!!
I think we established that the test was flawed. The mtronic takes too long to adjust for the test to be conclusive.
