High Quality Chainsaw Bars Husqvarna Toys Hockfire Saws

Tree Monkey MS462 - PART 2

Redfin

Meh...
Local time
3:38 AM
User ID
159
Joined
Dec 24, 2015
Messages
7,645
Reaction score
39,994
Location
Central Pa
Country flag
no, I didn't want to waste a cylinder for the test, there were no real differences in the timed cuts for me to go further with gutting them at this time.
You think there was anything left on the table having the charge only being able to mix in the boot before it hit the face of the split jug?
 

tree monkey

Mastermind Approved!
Local time
2:38 AM
User ID
339
Joined
Dec 14, 2015
Messages
4,820
Reaction score
39,964
Location
wi
Country flag
You think there was anything left on the table having the charge only being able to mix in the boot before it hit the face of the split jug?

I don't see how hogging that area out will improve flow without changing the port window. there's not much that can be done to that window.
we can give the strato port a longer duration by lowering the cylinder or raising the cutout in the piston, but we can't shorten the duration.
 

tree monkey

Mastermind Approved!
Local time
2:38 AM
User ID
339
Joined
Dec 14, 2015
Messages
4,820
Reaction score
39,964
Location
wi
Country flag
Dood, Ive racked your brain in person. You think I wont hesitate online?

So... back to the carb. The volume of air (thinking of the divided strato carb) passing the jets really has no bearing on the amount of fuel delievered?

Edit: volume compared to an open venturi.

i'm assuming that half the volume of air entering the saw goes through the intake port and half the strato ports. I can't verify this.

lets say 75% of the air wet through the strato's, is 25% of the air enough flow, in the fuel side of the carb, to create the low pressure needed to deliver fuel correctly? most likely not.

so yes air flow could become a problem in the fuel side of the carb, but I don't think we can get to that point in porting.
 

tree monkey

Mastermind Approved!
Local time
2:38 AM
User ID
339
Joined
Dec 14, 2015
Messages
4,820
Reaction score
39,964
Location
wi
Country flag
I would think you don't have to reinvent the wheel here, Stihl spent a lot of money on R&D and they seem to make it pretty stout out of the box, I would think the largest gains will come from small changes, just my 2 cents, happy to be wrong.

yes just improve a little here and there.
 

Deets066

AKA Deetsey
Local time
3:38 AM
User ID
290
Joined
Dec 28, 2015
Messages
15,443
Reaction score
73,576
Location
Illinois
Country flag
i'm assuming that half the volume of air entering the saw goes through the intake port and half the strato ports. I can't verify this.

lets say 75% of the air wet through the strato's, is 25% of the air enough flow, in the fuel side of the carb, to create the low pressure needed to deliver fuel correctly? most likely not.

so yes air flow could become a problem in the fuel side of the carb, but I don't think we can get to that point in porting.
You said it before, it’s not the volume of air goin through the carb that pulls fuel but the velocity of the flow
 

tree monkey

Mastermind Approved!
Local time
2:38 AM
User ID
339
Joined
Dec 14, 2015
Messages
4,820
Reaction score
39,964
Location
wi
Country flag
the carb is only going to flow a certain cfm, above and below the divider. my way of looking at this is, lets get as much through the fuel side as posable and then play with the strato's
 
Top