afleetcommand
Pinnacle OPE Member
Looking forward to THAT video. One of my favorite saw videos is the one where you and @afleetcommand compare vintage saws to the throw away homeowner units.
Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
Looking forward to THAT video. One of my favorite saw videos is the one where you and @afleetcommand compare vintage saws to the throw away homeowner units.
Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
If that can punch some bars you might see a few show up in the mail lol.I know we’re getting sidetracked, but I think I agree with Bob on a lot of points. There’s so much work to do on the days I’m in the woods that I just want a reliable saw, it doesn’t have to be the fastest, just needs good power and a sharp chain. I can do basic mods, and I have a lathe and mill and work as a machinist, besides a right angle foredom tool to do upper transfers I can do everything else myself. I just think that the 5+ hours tearing down, measuring, degreeing, grinding, boring, testing, etc will never be gotten back by saving 2 seconds in a cut. So I can’t justify it in terms of work productivity.
Maybe for the “fun” factor some people can justify spending the money or time on it, but the best reason I see to do it is because it would allow using a smaller saw when normally I’d feel like a larger saw is necessary.
My 562xpg as a 60cc saw is about doing everything I need these days- I still have my 372xpw and 395xp, but their use is getting less and less. I love running them, but finding the wood where they are needed is getting to be more of a “for that particular job” than for a “I’ll just grab this saw as I trust it can do what I need today.”
I too am like Bob, and Walt, in that I’m looking for the ultimate old man saw. I currently love my 346xp NE, and if it ever dies I’ll jump over to a 550xpg since the 50cc weight class is an ideal weight-to-power ratio for a firewood saw. However, I think some of the best weight savings is not so much in the saw but in these new lightweight bars. The laminates are good, but the Tsumura RW / Sugihara are really nice, they just cost so much! I’m debating trying the hydraulic punch press at work to make my own. Lol.
To go lighter, sub 50cc, I agree again with Bob: you give up a dose of power to save a little bit more in weight. I looked at some sub 50cc saws and I would consider a Stihl MS200, but I don’t love the top handle since I’m not a climber. I think they made a long body version, but I’m not sure.
Anyway, I’m digging this discussion, even if we are going off topic.
If that can punch some bars you might see a few show up in the mail lol.
Husky: nix the 543xp and give us back an updated 242xp....pretty please!
Best answer?....they could do it if they wanted too, a 40ish CC revboost enhanced sub 9lb screamer that free revs @14k+. Vertical split mag case, nice spring AV and a decent filter. Damn is that too much too ask!Husky: nix the 543xp and give us back an updated 242xp....pretty please!
Bar and chain options is where I'll struggle a bit for this one. WANT a .404 sprocket so I can have a "modern" roller nose bar and something better than the mac Pin Tail...Ohhhhhhhhhh Boy! Looks like we're closer than I thought we were.
Love reading all this but I think the OMS moniker should be changed to Common Since Saw.
Nice.It’ll punch a 3” hole through 3/8” plate steel, I know that. We have smaller punches too.
Sugihara makes a double punch and mills out a pocket to connect them on both sides.
Oregon just mills a long pocket out on both sides.
I don’t know if Tsumura is punching through, like Sugi, or just milling pockets like Oregon.
I belive its a mag case, its the only good part the 543 has.And isn't the 543 a plastic case clamshell?? Been awhile since I've read up on or cared about the 543 so I forget
Walt, I haven’t heard any complaints about the Tsumura’s 4-pin rivets failing. I have heard good things about their RW bars, but I would think the fastest way to wear out a tip would be plunge cutting / bore cuts. Still, the whole point of a replaceable nose is that you CAN replace the tip, which isn’t possible on the laminate bars.
For sure .325 0.050 is lighter than 3/8 0.050, which is lighter than 3/8 0.063.
I belive its a mag case, its the only good part the 543 has.