High Quality Chainsaw Bars Husqvarna Toys Hockfire Saws

The SCARR Husqvarna 592XP build thread.

huskyboy

Sorta a husqvarna guy...
Local time
7:21 AM
User ID
1352
Joined
May 30, 2016
Messages
10,025
Reaction score
43,464
Location
Ct
Country flag
After messing with the 585 coil I think it’s a very soft touch rev limiter and that is why it messes with the tach so much. I had to wrap a wire around the high lead to get the tach away from interference and I could see it start to get wild at anything over 12k. So it’s probably starting to pull sparks there and making it feel like a 4 stroke at around 12.5-13k but then the tach is going crazy from the wasted energy.

You can hear it increase in rpm a bit more from a stable 12k but the tach jumps around from 7k to 19k readings.

Note: this is with a FastTach. Maybe another brand would have less issues.
A 550mk2 does the same thing to my fast tach as well. I didn’t pay much attention to it cause like you I figured it was the rev limiter messing with it. I was able to get a more consistent reading once I put it in wood.
 
Last edited:

huskyboy

Sorta a husqvarna guy...
Local time
7:21 AM
User ID
1352
Joined
May 30, 2016
Messages
10,025
Reaction score
43,464
Location
Ct
Country flag
I beg the differ with you sir. As a full time sawyer, max rpm matters a lot for limbing timber, which in my line of work takes up to half a days worth of sawing.....just cutting limbs off
Swapping the 12.8 coil to the 13.5 on my 7310 didn’t really increase power or anything. But it sure made topping trees I felled smoother/more efficient. We have a harvester so I don’t limb as much anymore… but I still cut up the tops of the larger hardwoods that it can’t process.
 

bryanr2

Pinnacle OPE Member
Local time
7:21 AM
User ID
20
Joined
Dec 4, 2015
Messages
2,328
Reaction score
8,179
Location
USA
Country flag
Swapping the 12.8 coil to the 13.5 on my 7310 didn’t really increase power or anything. But it sure made topping trees I felled smoother/more efficient. We have a harvester so I don’t limb as much anymore… but I still cut up the tops of the larger hardwoods that it can’t process.
7310 Dolmar or echo?
 

Nutball

Here For The Long Haul!
Local time
6:21 AM
User ID
7732
Joined
Oct 31, 2018
Messages
4,214
Reaction score
11,649
Location
Mt. Juliet, TN
Country flag
My Echo compression gauge has the standard and 10mm adapter with shrader. My Master mind 2511 was a hair over 200 psi with it.
Wow, my gauge doesn't have the valve in the adapter, just where the adapter connects to 14mm, and I read over 70 psi less on a high compression 2511 when hot. A few drops of oil in a cold cylinder will get it much closer to 200 on my gauge. I recently test ran a 2511 I ported with less compression than another I was comparing to, and it was a little faster. I kept the compression on the low side because the repeat customer liked their first one so much, which wasn't very high. Seemed like the right move according to the cut times. The higher compression one felt like it pulled harder and was overall faster, but was consistently 2 seconds or more slower.
 

srcarr52

Shop rat, backyard slice cutter.
GoldMember
Local time
7:21 AM
User ID
522
Joined
Jan 12, 2016
Messages
4,088
Reaction score
26,854
Location
Iowa City
Country flag
I started to tear into these further so here are some pictures.

585 on the left, 592 on the right. Intake are the same, even the same part numbers.
IMG_2207.JPG

Here is the 592 cylinder dropped on the 585 case... direct fit.
IMG_2210.JPG
 

srcarr52

Shop rat, backyard slice cutter.
GoldMember
Local time
7:21 AM
User ID
522
Joined
Jan 12, 2016
Messages
4,088
Reaction score
26,854
Location
Iowa City
Country flag
Comparing the cylinder, again 585 on the left.

All the ports look of similar shape and size (ratio to bore). The transfer lowers are pretty much identical, of course the bores are different sizes but so are the skirt extensions. So the 585 skirt extension is floating around in the case. Both exhaust ports have an identical wave pattern in the roof. The 585 intake port is rough cast while the 592 port is smooth like it's been machined. You can see the stock squish measured at 0.023" and 0.022".

IMG_2212.JPG IMG_2211.JPG IMG_2213.JPG IMG_2216.JPG
 

srcarr52

Shop rat, backyard slice cutter.
GoldMember
Local time
7:21 AM
User ID
522
Joined
Jan 12, 2016
Messages
4,088
Reaction score
26,854
Location
Iowa City
Country flag
Both have a very interesting asymmetrical crank and case. I'm betting the crank is a two piece design with the rod pin machined on the PTO side. This is a much stronger design than a 3 piece but adds machining and hardening complexities.

Also note, the gasket is pretty close to the transfer port shape so they are shrouded by the case a fair amount.

IMG_2214.JPG

A few more interesting differences is the lightening pockets on the 592 piston and the cast in wave pattern (that we are used to seeing) on the transfer tunnel missing on the 592.

IMG_2215.JPG
 

ZukiRyder440

Breaker of recoils
Local time
7:21 AM
User ID
5876
Joined
Apr 11, 2018
Messages
1,106
Reaction score
4,686
Location
NY
Country flag
Lowers look identical to the 575/576’s. 56 mm bore?
 

Maintenance Chief

Disrupting the peace with an old chainsaw
Local time
7:21 AM
User ID
11378
Joined
Jan 4, 2020
Messages
3,905
Reaction score
12,579
Location
South Carolina
Country flag
Both have a very interesting asymmetrical crank and case. I'm betting the crank is a two piece design with the rod pin machined on the PTO side. This is a much stronger design than a 3 piece but adds machining and hardening complexities.

Also note, the gasket is pretty close to the transfer port shape so they are shrouded by the case a fair amount.

View attachment 317018

A few more interesting differences is the lightening pockets on the 592 piston and the cast in wave pattern (that we are used to seeing) on the transfer tunnel missing on the 592.

View attachment 317019

It strikes me as odd that there are cut out bumps in the gasket but not the case?20211122_183320.jpg
 
Top