- Local time
- 9:02 PM
- User ID
- 4
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2015
- Messages
- 51,080
- Reaction score
- 338,725
- Location
- Banner Springs Tennessee
Oh no you dintIn case you want the real oil thread, and not the baby one.
Oh no you dintIn case you want the real oil thread, and not the baby one.
Olive, Wesson, light mineral, baby oil, coconut oil, linseed oil, sunflower seed oil.Would it not be easier to list the oils not to use ?
Or:
32:1 synthetic
87 non ethanol at least not for storage.
? Are you referring to fuel mix for these? Husky manual on 592xp says run saws over 75cc or for commercial use at 33:1i asked fot autotune husqvarna, not stihl
my biggest saw is 70 ccm autotune? Are you referring to fuel mix for these? Husky manual on 592xp says run saws over 75cc or for commercial use at 33:1
What denotes commercial i have no idea as saws run, well i do run them, flat out regardless of situation as thats what they are designed to do, in the short if it. Also had 32:1 in another 592 husky spec. Anyway just wanted to ask, thought this may help as many dealerships here will tell customers 50:1 and yet the manual to for eg a 592 states 33:1
I'm having a time trying to contemplate this one. In my thinking nothing but mix goes through the crankcase and nothing but air goes through the stratos... no? Unless of course the stratos were "dirtied up", or you really meant automatic tuning that doesn't allow running at a richer mixture?about strato engines is spot on too. Far less mix is directed thru the crankcase...which means less oil.
Conventionally ported engines use mixed "air" to purge the exhaust. That means more hydrocarbons in the exhaust stream. It also means a higher total volume of mixed "air" travels through the crankcase even though quite a lot of it is "wasted". The stratified engines purge the exhaust with fresh air. That means whatever percentage of mixed "air" that was used for that purpose is now not traveling through the crankcase. Less mix equals less oil.I'm having a time trying to contemplate this one. In my thinking nothing but mix goes through the crankcase and nothing but air goes through the stratos... no? Unless of course the stratos were "dirtied up", or you really meant automatic tuning that doesn't allow running at a richer mixture?
I see, less waste less oil.Conventionally ported engines use mixed "air" to purge the exhaust. That means more hydrocarbons in the exhaust stream. It also means a higher total volume of mixed "air" travels through the crankcase even though quite a lot of it is "wasted". The stratified engines purge the exhaust with fresh air. That means whatever percentage of mixed "air" that was used for that purpose is now not traveling through the crankcase. Less mix equals less oil.
came on the second reading.Conventionally ported engines use mixed "air" to purge the exhaust. That means more hydrocarbons in the exhaust stream. It also means a higher total volume of mixed "air" travels through the crankcase even though quite a lot of it is "wasted". The stratified engines purge the exhaust with fresh air. That means whatever percentage of mixed "air" that was used for that purpose is now not traveling through the crankcase. Less mix equals less oil.
In layman’s terms, if stratos are 30% more efficient, they’re getting the same work done on 30% less fuel and oil. 50:1 in a strato is more like 70:1 to the enginecame on the second reading.
I had a failure on the piston, it was not seized, but you can see abrasions on the entire surface that is in contact with the cylinder bore. I had a photo somewheredo you guys that port a lot of saws or run saw shops see more failures on the bottom half of the engines that are strato saws
what was your mix ratio?I had a failure on the piston, it was not seized, but you can see abrasions on the entire surface that is in contact with the cylinder bore. I had a photo somewhere
I either misconstrued or misunderstood what Randy said about what you said(which I didn't even catch that part) as to a "where" fuel/oil was going rather than a how much or volumetric equation from increased efficiency. Which makes perfect sense after he splained it to me.In layman’s terms, if stratos are 30% more efficient, they’re getting the same work done on 30% less fuel and oil. 50:1 in a strato is more like 70:1 to the engine
I don't do that many rebuilds or repairs compared to most saw shops. But, I rarely see bottom end failures in either.do you guys that port a lot of saws or run saw shops see more failures on the bottom half of the engines that are strato saws
That’s a main failure in a 5 series husky running mediocre oil at 50:1. Along with some fuel/carb issues.do you guys that port a lot of saws or run saw shops see more failures on the bottom half of the engines that are strato saws