Thanks ....... no more derail I will pm you
Cheers D
Is this something for you Steve?Thought that this McCulloch Pro Mac 700 squish band and combustion chamber was interesting for being stock and forty years old.
View attachment 184293
The design of the 10 series is a study of it's own .With the staggered transfer ports it should scavenge very well . I had thought perhaps either a sweep or a little finger towards the intake .from the first transfer might make a little bit of improvement but never tried it .They say McCulloch’s were “maxed out” from the factory. By the look of the factory jugs I’ve seen, I can understand why that has been said.
I need to run more Macs, the few stock ones I've run have not impressed me, but they didn't have the best of chains either. Videos I've seen haven't been impressive either. Modified is a whole different story.They say McCulloch’s were “maxed out” from the factory. By the look of the factory jugs I’ve seen, I can understand why that has been said.
I need to run more Macs, the few stock ones I've run have not impressed me, but they didn't have the best of chains either. Videos I've seen haven't been impressive either. Modified is a whole different story.
Does anyone shave a little off the side of the crown above the ring when adding compression to compensate for more heat expansion? Maybe only for race builds? I came across a 026 piston that had a much tighter fit in the cylinder than most other models I've measured, and it got me wondering.
Compression is Silly!!! Most of my race saws run less than 170psi
Here is a Mac that has the power to impress anyone. @mdavlee and I had to tag team the saw to get it started and neither of us are exactly small guys
Mike took the first cuts and then @Lee H took the reins of this beast (it's his by the way) and gave the cant some hell. If you are wondering how strong the saw is, watch uncle Lee's upcut and how despite plenty of experience and a good solid stance it started to push him back a little.
Trust me, a well built McCulloch is a thing of beauty!!
A well-built Mac is pretty amazing and Uncle Lee builds some of the best. If you guys want a good read from the archives on modified saws and compression, go here:
https://www.arboristsite.com/community/threads/biggest-perpetuated-myths-about-modded-saws.65396/
Brian (Timberwolf) built some good runners when he was in it.
Dennis Cahoon once told me that as long as there was no physical interference, the tighter the better on squish clearance. Brian (Timberwolf) once suggested .014 as a good starting point to me when I asked him directly.
Keep in mind that these are guys taking things over to the extreme side.
I'm my experience (and at this point I have a little) you need enough squish clearance to allow for carbon to build up. And it will in a real world working saw. Personally, I use .020" on a smaller saw, and .025" on a bigger saw.
Compression adds grunt. But....can be detrimental to RPM. You gotta build the saw to suit the end use. There are no one size fits all solutions. Which is why I try to refrain from wading in these days. I'd rather just read along....and be amused.
In my experience (and at this point I have a little) you need enough squish clearance to allow for carbon to build up. And it will in a real world working saw. Personally, I use .020" on a smaller saw, and .025" on a bigger saw.