- Local time
- 3:50 PM
- User ID
- 5156
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2018
- Messages
- 8,670
- Reaction score
- 33,303
- Location
- Extreme Southeast CA
Sweet, at least yers is a 4x4. My 93 is just a 2wd with a 305 and 5 speedThis is my beast. Just goes to the neighbors field lines around here. Custom paint job thanks to the kids!
Ford ranger with bfg MT tires?Wood truck is loaded up with no where to go lol.View attachment 319554
It’s got bfg ko2 at’s. I should’ve went mt’s though.Ford ranger with bfg MT tires?
Wood truck is loaded up with no where to go lol.View attachment 319554
Rangers are good little pickups. Had 2 of them a 92 square body and a 97. Both 4x4 and 4.0 v6 with 5 sp manuals. The 92 was hands down the best logging crummy I've ever owned. It hauled a 105 gallon slip tank full of diesel daily, with a big tool set, saws, hydraulic hose assortment and 2 guys. All up and down rough logging roads which one way was about 80 miles from my house!I used to drive rangers. Had a 1989, 1997, 1993 and a 2002.
The 1997 and 2002 were 4x4’s.
Those were awesome trucks. Especially the 1989 with the 2.9 v6. That little thing had proper power. Lays rubber, easily pulls trailers and good on gas. Then Ford ruined it when they went the 3.0 v6. Gutless turd that satisfies the oil companies and government
Lol, in the bottom pict, I thought yer truck had an exhaust stack sticking up out of the wood pile!!!!
Lol, in the bottom pict, I thought yer truck had an exhaust stack sticking up out of the wood pile!!!!
Yea your right. That load of wood cost a little more than just labor. I didn't have the normal spot for my saw and didn't want to make another trip, so it fell out on the trip back causing me to buy some plastic for the saw.That’s a full load.