I like threads like this with trail and error, lots of ideas tossed around. I also like you’re doing what I said F it to with a 70cc class Stihl, the Swedes have more potential for this stuff.
Sounds like you should start a thread. We've got enough members and builders here to supply the data. I bet with as many saws as some see in a year the data could come in quickly. It doesn't take much time to collect it.
We need a standard template for the crankshafts and pistons to keep everything as organized as possible. Sounds like @redline4 might have a lead on the crankshafts template.
I've got a couple different saws torn apart right now that I could collect the crankshaft and piston data on. I was going to do it anyhow just for future reference if needed. Ive been wanting to build a stroker/hybrid out of a smaller saw hence the reason for starting to collect information. I already have all the dimensions for one saw wrote in a notebook.
I knew you'd beat me to it. My grand finale was going to be my humble admission that being able to put all this together, weather it work or not, will NEVER compare to the art that is what you and the fellers do on here Kevin. I don't mind sticking my neck out. My hope would be for you to get your hands on THIS and KICK my ass with itI rarely mess around with stuff like this because sooner or later someone will show up with a pure 1128 and kick your ass with it. That’s just how it goes.
But on the other hand, I kind of wanna see how it runs. Lord knows it won’t be the first time we’ve seen an 066 grenade on video
I bookmarked the thread. Thank you! Looks like it's time to bump that thread and get it rolling again.Crankshaft data base
I was thinking that a data base of crank measurements (I know) would be useful. When I decided to swap a Solo 681 crank into a Dolmar 7900, Randy and I measured and compared cranks (I know). Could really open the door for some cool builds. I’m not asking you to pull out your crank and measure...opeforum.com
@NateSaw I do have a question about the free porting of the upper transfers. Maybe I didn't follow what you said? How is that free port a problem? I ask to learn, plus ask since all open transfer cylinders already have the same (more actually) free port. I was under the impression the open transfers biggest problem is lack of air direction from the lowers to and through the uppers with how it flows the air into the cylinders? More dead heads then flows. Comparing open an open transfer to an closed transfer it's easy to see the lack of air flow direction.
What am I missing? I'm here to learn, of that maybe means asking a stupid question, so be it! Fire away! Others are more than welcome to fire away, let's not limit it to just Nate thumping me! LOL
That's the only spot I could really see it hurting. You know it has to be feeding case pressure out the exhaust.I think you’re right that the transfer upper isn’t freeporting just because it opens above and below the rings at the same time. But the missing ring and raised piston windows allow a pathway from the case out the exhaust, killing case compression.
Bingo. That's it. And it's a big traffic jam waiting to get off the freeway. Thanks Caleb. I'm not good at explaining.I think you’re right that the transfer upper isn’t freeporting just because it opens above and below the rings at the same time. But the missing ring and raised piston windows allow a pathway from the case out the exhaust, killing case compression.
That was fastLollzzzz
Nope.Run piston #1 !!
Yes. The usual. 0.077"-0.052"Have you advanced the ignition?