- Local time
- 12:13 AM
- User ID
- 441
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2016
- Messages
- 4,285
- Reaction score
- 10,915
- Location
- Farmington, CT
Amazing. Kudos.
An old guy.....a well respected fella, once told me that it makes more difference raising the transfer entrance than lowering it. At that time everyone was cutting the transfer entrance all the way to the base.
Raising the lowers in the 395 is just copying what they did to the 394 from the factory. It’s pretty obvious when you hold a 394 cylinder next to a 395. As to why they did that?… I’m not sure. Would be interesting to do timed cuts or a dyno test to see the difference. Would save a lot of time grinding if it wasn’t any gain.
Do you feel that intake duration (or port timing in general) effects how much the lowers like to be opened?
Tying to replicate the 394 lowers on the 395’s. Didn’t mean copy in a bad way. Just my way of thinking.Didn't the 394 come out before the 395? How would that be a copy?
Know the feeling. Nice work!084 nothing fancy
Just a dumb kid from middle of nowhere having fun lol
Sounds like a cool idea. If someone had means to do so.You could mill (port) any timing #'s you desire with CNC...
Just curious.
Maybe not with an existing cylinderim not a machinist, but i cant really picture a way to do anything meaningful to a chainsaw cylinder via cnc. it would certainly be cool for repeatability but just cant see the tooling aspect being workable.
Porting game so strong....Know the feeling. Nice work!