blsnelling
Friend of the Riff Raff
- Local time
- 3:56 PM
- User ID
- 447
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2016
- Messages
- 1,114
- Reaction score
- 6,234
- Location
- Franklin, OH
Well, of course I did. It's ALL my fault. Just ask around. Everyone knows that!Brad did this on purpose.
Well, of course I did. It's ALL my fault. Just ask around. Everyone knows that!Brad did this on purpose.
Easy on the captain. He's a good guy.I don't think you understand the history involved with the bs coming out of your mouth so far
Now that's funny!!As long as they ain't your titties...........again.
Lol. He is only the second person I have put on ignore...did it two days ago.I don't know what Thomas had to say because I've had him on ignore for months but he brings nothing to the site.
Brad thank u for owning up to disassembly of the saw and it being mechanically sound before it gave up the ghost. I was the 1st to run this saw and it ran really well but lacked what I considered lean on torque to my taste even though it ran really well. I ran my MMWS390xp behind it and it was daylight to dark difference in lean on torque. My buddy John who owned the saw ran it and tuned it alil and was not satisfied with the lean on torque compared to my 390xp, so we agreed at a later date to do different setups to compare them again. In the meantime John had made the decision to sell the saw instead and we never ran the saw again. The saw was sold in a really good running condition to Edwad Im sure of. I talk to Jason upon a month but he really drove me down on my opinion of the torque. John and I neither one knew of any AM parts in this saw until Brad informed us of what he discovered. Theres alot more in conversations between Jason with John, Edwad, and myself thats been hashed out in detail in another thread fellows.1. That was nothing but an attempted cover-up by Jason because the customer wasn't happy with the saw.
What you don't know is that I pulled the cylinder off this saw before I ever ran it. It was fully inspected before I ran it. After all, that's what I was asked to do. I didn't just pull it out of the box, fire it up, and go WOT.
There was nothing obvious mechanically wrong with it. I found numerous issues of sloppy work, but nothing that would have caused a catastrophic failure. I even degreed the saw and pulled a compression check.
Before this video was made, I made one or two cuts with it to make sure it ran right and to tune it. It actually ran very well, IMHO. I turned on the camera, verified the tune RPMs on the tach, which was only 13,800 IIRC, and it went boom before I could video a cut in the wood.
For whatever reason, either the rod or the piston failed. My opinion is that it was the piston. It had been ground on and lightened, but not so much so that I anticipated its failure. Why did it fail? I can't tell you that.
5. Jason built the saw and it exploded, costing the owner $500 in parts alone. Is that not enough reason? How is it any different than Randy starting this thread?
Feel free to ask any questions. We all know what happens when we make assumptions.
You would be wrong. I just explained it in my post. Furthermore I didnt sell the saw but John did. All I did was offer my opinion to Jason on the saw and hell broke loose for a monthIf there was a problem with it, according to JMS, why did Keith and John sell it to another, instead of sending it back to JMS? You may not be able to answer this, but it is what I've always found to be hinky in this whole saga.
Yeah maybe so I hadn't seen it thoEasy on the captain. He's a good guy.
He's the only person I've ever put on ignore in 7 years on these forums.Lol. He is only the second person I have put on ignore...did it two days ago.
I don't think you understand the history involved with the bs coming out of your mouth so far
I'd be happy to lay it out right here. Thomas trolls threads throwing bait in the water looking for someone to bit then he reals them in. You can't take anything his says as truth. That's that so don't hang on anything he says.Maybe not, but I had the chance to deal with Brad and Jason, and it wasn't easy with Jason.
Apparently you didn't see T1's posts, but telling someone destroyed someone else's saw on purpose just to put a shame on another builder is a serious accusation. I consider Brad as a friend so I won't let this go if there are other guy to think the same.
If you have something to explain to me about my BS, just let me know with a PM please.
And no I didn't see what he said I put him on ignoreMaybe not, but I had the chance to deal with Brad and Jason, and it wasn't easy with Jason.
Apparently you didn't see T1's posts, but telling someone destroyed someone else's saw on purpose just to put a shame on another builder is a serious accusation. I consider Brad as a friend so I won't let this go if there are other guy to think the same.
If you have something to explain to me about my BS, just let me know with a PM please.
I wasn't really aware of that, my bad. So I suppose you speaked about his BS?I'd be happy to lay it out right here. Thomas trolls threads throwing bait in the water looking for someone to bit then he reals them in. You can't take anything his says as truth. That's that so don't hang on anything he says.
Yes I just went back and read what I put. What I was trying to say is you don't understand the bs......I *f-worded up my bad lolI wasn't really aware of that, my bad. So I suppose you speaked about his BS?
That's fine. But someone will have to explain to me what "frenched" means, has this something to do with "french"?Yes I just went back and read what I put. What I was trying to say is you don't understand the bs......I *frenched up my bad lol
It edited me saying f u c k e dThat's fine. But someone will have to explain to me what "frenched" means, has this something to do with "french"?
Pretty weird!It edited me saying f u c k e d




