I misspokeIf the KS is a new piston then that would be my choice. Check crown height though, I bet it's lower.
I assume it’s more than for weight reduction.You could, but the oem is tapered for a reason
The oem pin has some "meat" where needed, then tapers off to reduce weight.I assume it’s more than for weight reduction.
If drilled or counterbored, that will create a failure point within the ID of the pin.
Not a good idear
Whole different deal here Mike, has nothing to do with wings or 44's. But crown height and skirt lengthI ordered a new piston for my 10 mm 044, figured while I was deleting the base gasket I would replace it.
The new piston was a Mahle, the orig a KS. The KS has wings and is taller. The skirts measured about the same diameter. I still have the Mahle piston in a box, the original piston and rings are still in the saw. Runs just great!
2 demerits. ....turn in your gold star ...[emoji2]I misspoke
It’s not a KS.
One is Mahle, the other is Stihl
Only if you take engrish crasses2 demerits. ....turn in your gold star ...[emoji2]
I tookka de' mafOnly if you take engrish crasses
at one time I think Horstman had larger than 50 thou over .I've always wondered about that Al. As you know, McCulloch offered up to .050" over pistons for certain engines and say, a .050" over piston for a 125 is a lot heavier than the standard sized slug. Even a .030" over piston is quite a bit heavier. My dad had several 125 and 101 over-bore engines in his saws and he never really said anything about spool-up or more torque in the cut. But in his case bar length was probably a factor as he was running 42" and 60" bars.
I know making the reciprocating assembly lighter in some modern saws like the 066/660 can reduce vibration to a point or change the frequency of vibration so it's easier on your hands.
increases stress on the engine exponentially.
EasilyThink I can take 6g of mass off this meteor piston safely?