What's on your bench?

[Czed]

Working up a red97 deflector for my 86 266xpput a 372 pull handle and true blue 4.5 rope on it
The old style pull handles are a *b-word
To hold onto after a few broke knuckles
And arthritis.

 

[drf256]

MS261 x 2. One V1 and one V2.

The V2 jug noticeably lighter, but at how much cooling expense? I'm sure they figured it out with some thermal wizardry.

 

[huskyboy]

MS261 x 2. One V1 and one V2.

The V2 jug noticeably lighter, but at how much cooling expense? I'm sure they figured it out with some thermal wizardry.

View attachment 190690 View attachment 190691 View attachment 190692

Are the timing numbers the same in both doc?

 

[Sty57]

.

 

[NCPT]

.

Nice

 

[dustinwilt68]

Dang nice saw Brian!

 

[Sty57]

Dang nice saw Brian!

Thanks Dustin

 

[drf256]

Are the timing numbers the same in both doc?

I’ll see soon enough.

 

[kingOFgEEEks]

MS261 x 2. One V1 and one V2.

The V2 jug noticeably lighter, but at how much cooling expense? I'm sure they figured it out with some thermal wizardry.

View attachment 190690 View attachment 190691 View attachment 190692

I wonder if less mass helps the cooling. The heat might possibly be able to escape more easily. Or maybe not.

 

[Willard]

It looks to me the newer version cylinder is better isolated from the exterior exhaust port flange, alot.
Plus with the diagonal fins the cooling air from the fanwheel housing is blowing the heat straight out front upwards past the muffler.
Head fins also follow the same airflow .
Would be near impossible to plug those fins with chips and sap.

 

[drf256]

Theses jugs seem to be cast from the same alloy as the old KS jugs. Harder to cut than Mahle.

The V2 has an additional “drip” hole cast into the jug. It’s the hole between the intake floor and the impulse groove/hole coming up from the base. The V1 doesn’t have the hole.

Both cylinder mount to my builder case eggzackery the same way. I’m not so uncertain that a V2 jug couldn’t be retrofitted to save an ounce or two lol.

 

[drf256]

I wonder if less mass helps the cooling. The heat might possibly be able to escape more easily. Or maybe not.

I’m sure that they used thermal testing to figure it out. I bet thermal images while running the saw.

Looks at where they put the fins. There’s almost no fins where the transfers and stratos are, which should be the coolest area from incoming charge. There’s a bunch by the exhaust port and then a bunch by the head.

Pretty interesting stuff. The V2 is noticably lighter in the hand than the V1. I took .030 from the bands, but I can weigh them before the base/ext cuts.

Interestingly enough, the V1 jug’s band was perfect from the factory. The V2 band was out by .004 on one side.

The V1 also has a thicker base flange.

 

[redlight066]

Maybe an 18” bar might be a little much for a ms192’s clutch......and the rest of the saw while we’re at it. Lol!

 

[Willard]

Maybe an 18” bar might be a little much for a ms192’s clutch......and the rest of the saw while we’re at it. Lol!

View attachment 190858

I'm running a 16" .043 3/8 Oregon 90 chain on my little Husqvarna T536 LiXP and it pulls it fine.

 

[Willard]

 

[huskihl]

 

[drf256]

View attachment 190990 View attachment 190991 View attachment 190992 View attachment 190993

Can you even fit a finger in that bore?

 

[redlight066]

I'm running a 16" .043 3/8 Oregon 90 chain on my little Husqvarna T536 LiXP and it pulls it fine.
View attachment 190977

For those who haven’t had the opportunity, the T536liXP is a bad lil’ m’fer. We have had 5 or 6 in service for nearly two years at Schneider’s. Aside from replacing busted plastics, they have been maintainence free. The guys love’em

 

[huskihl]

Can you even fit a finger in that bore?

Definitely an optical delusion

 

[rattler]