rogue60
Here For The Long Haul!

No body is a victim here only by choice we all share experiences and findings putting ourselves up to the same scrutiny there is no biased.A ton of stuff could be rehashed, Joe has a saw dyno, but testing costs money, oil, fuel, time, ect, ect. Why do all of it, then publish it here to be ridiculed in the court of public opinion? As far as 2 stroke technology goes, nothing much has changed since the 70’s really except oil. It would be interesting to see if modern oils hit the same 18:1 brick wall as far as performance was concerned. 2/3’s here probably still wouldn’t believe/accept the results. Some would jump up and down and scream “now just wait a cotton picking minute”. Sadly, they are the majority and are the ones who are embraced here, not the ones who actually wanted to document/share their findings to help other members.
As for 2T technology even industrial ya couldn't be more wrong! A crap tonne of advancement has been accomplished since the 70's. .. Most guys couldn't even pick up an old tank saw from the 70's let alone run one all day the lack of AV alone would have many in tears

And I dunno but I'm guessing a 500i or 392xp is slightly better technology than what the had in the 70's but I could be wrong?
Anyway this is going nowhere I'm off to do something productive have fun
