Hundred Acre Wood
Full-time Slacker
- Local time
- 2:31 PM
- User ID
- 25679
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2022
- Messages
- 576
- Reaction score
- 2,986
- Location
- On the hill
Well said.
Thanks
Well said.
No.Did you at least get a reach around? ....umm...asking for a friend
There’s dozens of us Echo weirdo’s that will judge you for it but you will get a fat stack of amsoil stickers to make up. Depends on your priorities
Is that anything like a bakers dozen?Well… maybe a Dutch dozen at least
It stains everything red in my experience. Mastermind may have another reason.Really Randy? Why? Is it crap?
When science isn’t science and facts are not facts it’s either Kennyesque or defying physics. Rolling element bearing failure analysis has been settled on a Worldwide ISO level for many years. Accelerometers are super cheap, hell there’s one in every smartphone. Embed one in a saw and let it feedback to the autotune or mtronic, it would throw fuel (oil) at it till it stopped the bearing noise or go so rich it wouldn’t run.Definitely not Kennyesque.
He's basically saying people's different uses mean different operating conditions for each use, and the lab test environment used by the manufacturer can only do so much to replicate all of them. i.e. no lab can perfectly replicate the real world.
He takes the lab results as his baseline "truth" until the real world experience proves otherwise.
That's pretty good advice really.
But that's also why the oil wars continue. Because two people use different oils at different ratios in different conditions, and both have good results. So not realizing that's it's the operating conditions that significantly contribute to the difference, they argue about the oils and ratios, because each thinks the other has to be wrong! They can't both be right, can they? Well... actually they can.
When science isn’t science and facts are not facts it’s either Kennyesque or defying physics. Rolling element bearing failure analysis has been settled on a Worldwide ISO level for many years. Accelerometers are super cheap, hell there’s one in every smartphone. Embed one in a saw and let it feedback to the autotune or mtronic, it would throw fuel (oil) at it till it stopped the bearing noise or go so rich it wouldn’t run.
Every rolling element bearing vibration signatures have been published for years. Inner race defect, outer race defect, ball spin frequency, and cage rate frequency. Yes an accelerometer would shut down a saw at a level above a stage 4 defect, which greasing or an oil change (richer auto tune/mtronic ratio in a 2 stroke case) corrects and save the bottom end and more likely a ton of top ends.You're suggesting flooding the engine to prevent destroying the bearings in the case where someone incorrectly mixed at 200:1, for example. Ok, that would be useful.
It's not clear to me how the accelerometer detects the impending bearing failure before false brinelling is already occurring though. Isn't it already too late?
Also, air cooled 2 strokes typically require Low-Ash oils, since the ash absorbs some of the heat and carries it away. As compared to Ash-Less oils required in liquid cooled 2 strokes, such as snowmobiles and dirt bikes..
You could do the same thing with acoustic emissions if you could filter the exhaust frequencies out effectively .Every rolling element bearing vibration signatures have been published for years. Inner race defect, outer race defect, ball spin frequency, and cage rate frequency. Yes an accelerometer would shut down a saw at a level above a stage 4 defect, which greasing or an oil change (richer auto tune/mtronic ratio in a 2 stroke case) corrects and save the bottom end and more likely a ton of top ends.
Every rolling element bearing vibration signatures have been published for years. Inner race defect, outer race defect, ball spin frequency, and cage rate frequency. Yes an accelerometer would shut down a saw at a level above a stage 4 defect, which greasing or an oil change (richer auto tune/mtronic ratio in a 2 stroke case) corrects and save the bottom end and more likely a ton of top ends.
Way way way before metals fail they scream out at you that they have had enough.I could see it potentially saving the top end, but it seems like the bottom end would already be on the path to death by the time the normalized signature deviation was significant enough.
Would be interesting to see implemented though.