Upper transfer angles

[Mastermind]

Repped ^^^^^^^^^^^

Back at ya Junkman

 

[Moparmyway]

You get a good 394/395 the 066s will be scared.

I ain't going to "like" this post, no matter how true it is

 

[Mastermind]

Go ahead.......it will only hurt for a second or two.

 

[Moparmyway]

After I run one that's stronger than either of my 066's, then I will try

 

[Mastermind]

The first time I ported a 395, I ran it against the 066 I had built for the GTG in KY. It beat that 066 by several seconds.........I was shocked.

 

[jmssaws]

Did you get that cylinder deets?

I've tried everything I can think of trying to build a 066/660 stronger than my 394 and I have failed so far. I've got one that's close but close is it, my 394 is my great white buffalo saw, it's my benchmark to beat and I'm still trying.

It's nothing flashy, 102 120 and in the 70's on the intake. Barely clipped the lip and just raised the uppers, no widening of anything really. O and 240+ lb of compression, that's as high as the starter let's me get it. Lol

 

[jmssaws]

After I run one that's stronger than either of my 066's, then I will try

Want me to send you my394?

 

[jmssaws]

 

[jmssaws]

Sorry for hijacking al.

 

[drf256]

Hijack away!!

I'm lovin it all.

 

[mdavlee]

Seen muffler modded and gasket delete 394 beat the older woods port 660s without machine work.

 

[Mastermind]

The 066

The 395

 

[jmssaws]

Seen muffler modded and gasket delete 394 beat the older woods port 660s without machine work.

The problem with lowering one as much as I did is having to raise the exhaust so much. Mine was 110 after machine work.
Lots of grinding.
Gotta take a 660 a long ways to get close to these saws.
I got a sporty 395 but it's just a 215lb work saw. Huskys seem to love compression.

 

[jmssaws]

The saw that turns the chain the fastest in the wood is hard to beat ain't it fellas.

 

[skippy]

The first time I ported a 395, I ran it against the 066 I had built for the GTG in KY. It beat that 066 by several seconds.........I was shocked.

Get back to what I said somewhere here slow stihls fast husqvarnas .

 

[jmssaws]

Get back to what I said somewhere here slow stihls fast husqvarnas .

I wouldn't call a stihl slow just slower. Lol

 

[skippy]

In those videos the husqvarnas smoked that 066

 

[skippy]

I wouldn't call a stihl slow just slower. Lol

Very good point not slow but slower than a husqvarnas

 

[drf256]

The Husky jugs I've seen definitely are more performance oriented. The ring pins, the port heights and the skirt widths have all been more favorable for more aggressive port and performance mods.

The problem is that they cant seem to make the rest of the saw support the jug for long. The overall build quality, plastics and fasteners are crap compared with stihls.

Far less ergonomic or reliable.

But thats my opinion only, and everyone's got their own.

 

[Mastermind]

Stihl for work, Husky for racing.