stihl_head1982
Here long time
- Local time
- 3:13 AM
- User ID
- 168
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2015
- Messages
- 4,153
- Reaction score
- 14,549
- Location
- USA
The Cross Performance 066 Top End
- Thread starter Mastermind
- Start date
MustangMike
Mastermind Approved!
- Local time
- 3:13 AM
- User ID
- 338
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2015
- Messages
- 11,524
- Reaction score
- 36,360
- Location
- Brewster, NY
Well, I can honestly say I was not home at the time CAUSE I WAS OUT CUTTING WOOD!!! But look what arrived today!
It looks real good to me! Pleased the box specifies Caber Rings, the intake port seems to be about as wide as the piston skirt would allow, and the upper transfers seem to nicely point toward the intake side.
It looks real good to me! Pleased the box specifies Caber Rings, the intake port seems to be about as wide as the piston skirt would allow, and the upper transfers seem to nicely point toward the intake side.
Attachments
MustangMike
Mastermind Approved!
- Local time
- 3:13 AM
- User ID
- 338
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2015
- Messages
- 11,524
- Reaction score
- 36,360
- Location
- Brewster, NY
I'm no expert, but quality looks good to me, with very minor casting stuff not removed and the pics don't show it well, but the plating looks good to me, and the piston seems to be a snug fit.
Attachments
MustangMike
Mastermind Approved!
- Local time
- 3:13 AM
- User ID
- 338
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2015
- Messages
- 11,524
- Reaction score
- 36,360
- Location
- Brewster, NY
MustangMike
Mastermind Approved!
- Local time
- 3:13 AM
- User ID
- 338
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2015
- Messages
- 11,524
- Reaction score
- 36,360
- Location
- Brewster, NY
I don't know how to port saws, but if I did have some skill with it the one thing I would do is fix the bottom of the intake, it is the only port that does not look symmetrical to me. Likely a minor problem that is mostly just cosmetic, but it is the one thing I would fix if I could.
The rest of it looks great to me.
The rest of it looks great to me.
Attachments
- Local time
- 3:13 AM
- User ID
- 441
- Joined
- Jan 8, 2016
- Messages
- 4,287
- Reaction score
- 10,946
- Location
- Farmington, CT
nice Mike! go for it!
MustangMike
Mastermind Approved!
- Local time
- 3:13 AM
- User ID
- 338
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2015
- Messages
- 11,524
- Reaction score
- 36,360
- Location
- Brewster, NY
Thank You Randy & Bruce for letting me participate in this testing ... I'm looking forward to it ... especially since I do not do any porting myself.
opcorn:
bikemike
Pinnacle OPE Member
- Local time
- 2:13 AM
- User ID
- 768
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2016
- Messages
- 2,263
- Reaction score
- 5,437
- Location
- Cottage grove mn
Before and after vid time. Get a new factory chain and pull a oem vid, before you break in the cross top
MustangMike
Mastermind Approved!
- Local time
- 3:13 AM
- User ID
- 338
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2015
- Messages
- 11,524
- Reaction score
- 36,360
- Location
- Brewster, NY
I figure as long as I use the same B&C for both power heads, it is good. But I also agree that after the initial test, I should replace the B&C to break the saw in, then test it again with the first B&C to see the difference.
FYI, I run RSLH on a 36" light bar on the 066. On other saws, my hand filed RSL does almost exactly the same as factory.
FYI, I run RSLH on a 36" light bar on the 066. On other saws, my hand filed RSL does almost exactly the same as factory.
- Local time
- 3:13 AM
- User ID
- 319
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2015
- Messages
- 9,601
- Reaction score
- 63,239
- Location
- Strong Island NY
Interesting stuff.
Can you take a pic of the stock jug when you pull it Mike?
Even better would be a shot of each port of each jug, side by side.
The uppers look huge to me and the exhaust roof too flat. Could be the angle.
The entire thing is Ubër Cool. Having a bolt on jug with this kinda performance upgrade at a reasonable price.
Can you take a pic of the stock jug when you pull it Mike?
Even better would be a shot of each port of each jug, side by side.
The uppers look huge to me and the exhaust roof too flat. Could be the angle.
The entire thing is Ubër Cool. Having a bolt on jug with this kinda performance upgrade at a reasonable price.
bikemike
Pinnacle OPE Member
- Local time
- 2:13 AM
- User ID
- 768
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2016
- Messages
- 2,263
- Reaction score
- 5,437
- Location
- Cottage grove mn
BTW thanks for the 026 filter cover. That showed up yesterday
MustangMike
Mastermind Approved!
- Local time
- 3:13 AM
- User ID
- 338
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2015
- Messages
- 11,524
- Reaction score
- 36,360
- Location
- Brewster, NY
Good idea Al. I also plan to compare the pistons, and put em on the scale.
I don't have a lot of experience, but the transfers also looked large to me, but these are large motors.
The exhaust roof is not flat, but does not have a lot of arch either.
But, as they say, the proof is in the pudding ... we will see how she runs!!!
MustangMike
Mastermind Approved!
- Local time
- 3:13 AM
- User ID
- 338
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2015
- Messages
- 11,524
- Reaction score
- 36,360
- Location
- Brewster, NY
Same here, my 066 does not feel lethargic like some of the stock 660s I have run.
wcorey
Pinnacle OPE Member
- Local time
- 3:13 AM
- User ID
- 29
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2015
- Messages
- 1,092
- Reaction score
- 4,690
- Location
- ma usa
The ex roof on these is pretty flat, if you remember the review thread I started on these kits it's discussed at some length.
There's a pic of where I traced it onto the piston.
http://opeforum.com/threads/mmws-cross-performance-066-660-cylinders.5110/
The uppers do look wide and are also fairly tall, making for a relatively narrow bridge, don't have a stock jug to compare with though.
Looks huge next to a Ks 064 jug I have at .90" x .34" and then 1.06" x .47" on the Cross.
The bare cross piston weighed in at 84 grams and a worn stock 066 at 94 grams.
