High Quality Chainsaw Bars Husqvarna Toys Hockfire Saws

So what's the current two stroke oil favorite?

Woodpecker

Sassy Madam
Staff member
GoldMember
Local time
4:39 AM
User ID
570
Joined
Jan 17, 2016
Messages
7,944
Reaction score
50,786
Location
The middle of the land shaped like a hand
Country flag
lots and lots of people have been running that stuff for years in saws with no issues. and it smells darn good too.
Yeah when Scott Kunz said he liked it and liked the way saws that had been run on it looked, I tried a few gallons. It’s great oil. I’d probably still use it if I wasn’t getting dominator cheaper.🤷🏼‍♂️
 

lehman live edge slab

Live Action
Local time
3:39 AM
User ID
3953
Joined
Sep 2, 2017
Messages
4,381
Reaction score
15,287
Location
Mn
Country flag
Correct, he gets his ambitions mixed up with his capabilities. Many of his before/after test cut times you can tell he is manipulating the cuts to show better 'after mods' results. When he stared touting this boutique almost backyard Motomilk oil with aerospace nano technology improved cut times by 20%+ I called him out and mentioned how wild of a claim that was. You could mix up virtually any 5 2T oils at the same ratio and be lucky to even detect a 2% cut time difference, hell U could mix up 30wt, at 40:1 and still be within margin of error on a 6 second cut time. He didn't like this and went nuts calling me all sorts of names and stuff. I told him his temperature testing with an infrared gun was not a good idea, I tools him to go buy a sparkplug thermocouple washer plugged up to a K multimeter to do it right as an easy cheap solution. He kinda listened & started using a multimeter with temperature lead but didn't get the thermocouple washer, instead stuck a probe into the cooling fins which really just measured what the cooling fan was doing, not cylinder temps. So then making claims about oils and temperature is silly delusion at best. I was nice to him when making some suggestions which ruffled his feather and ego. Joe did a great job doing his tests, he is honest and doesn't play games. But I think he was even quite chuckling inside after informing him of the 'placebo effect' . One poor guy recently paid him to port a new MS261 & tbh it ran a fair bit worse than a stock saw. But that's YT lots of good info and plenty more stuff you get a laugh out of.
Correct, he gets his ambitions mixed up with his capabilities. Many of his before/after test cut times you can tell he is manipulating the cuts to show better 'after mods' results. When he stared touting this boutique almost backyard Motomilk oil with aerospace nano technology improved cut times by 20%+ I called him out and mentioned how wild of a claim that was. You could mix up virtually any 5 2T oils at the same ratio and be lucky to even detect a 2% cut time difference, hell U could mix up 30wt, at 40:1 and still be within margin of error on a 6 second cut time. He didn't like this and went nuts calling me all sorts of names and stuff. I told him his temperature testing with an infrared gun was not a good idea, I tools him to go buy a sparkplug thermocouple washer plugged up to a K multimeter to do it right as an easy cheap solution. He kinda listened & started using a multimeter with temperature lead but didn't get the thermocouple washer, instead stuck a probe into the cooling fins which really just measured what the cooling fan was doing, not cylinder temps. So then making claims about oils and temperature is silly delusion at best. I was nice to him when making some suggestions which ruffled his feather and ego. Joe did a great job doing his tests, he is honest and doesn't play games. But I think he was even quite chuckling inside after informing him of the 'placebo effect' . One poor guy recently paid him to port a new MS261 & tbh it ran a fair bit worse than a stock saw. But that's YT lots of good info and plenty more stuff you get a laugh out of.
Apparently the dyno wasn’t good enough, building a cut machine to take the human error out of it. What about wood density variation and everything else. I told him the dyno was to take the human error out and the results are 100% believable. Him designing a machine to do the tests because he doesn’t believe the dyno is like designing a new steel ruler to measure with because you don’t believe your micrometer. Any tool he comes up with will be worse than the tool he already used to measure results.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_1351.png
    IMG_1351.png
    300.4 KB · Views: 11

Sloughfoot

Pinnacle OPE Member
Yearly GoldMember
Local time
1:39 AM
User ID
26879
Joined
Jun 7, 2023
Messages
705
Reaction score
1,772
Location
Norcal
Country flag
Apparently the dyno wasn’t good enough, building a cut machine to take the human error out of it. What about wood density variation and everything else. I told him the dyno was to take the human error out and the results are 100% believable. Him designing a machine to do the tests because he doesn’t believe the dyno is like designing a new steel ruler to measure with because you don’t believe your micrometer. Any tool he comes up with will be worse than the tool he already used to measure results.
Seen his 400.1 review? It's something else.
 

bwalker

Pinnacle OPE Member
Local time
4:39 AM
User ID
523
Joined
Jan 12, 2016
Messages
1,678
Reaction score
3,743
Location
Montana
Country flag
Apparently the dyno wasn’t good enough, building a cut machine to take the human error out of it. What about wood density variation and everything else. I told him the dyno was to take the human error out and the results are 100% believable. Him designing a machine to do the tests because he doesn’t believe the dyno is like designing a new steel ruler to measure with because you don’t believe your micrometer. Any tool he comes up with will be worse than the tool he already used to measure results.
Probably still believes in the tooth fairy.
 
Top