Huskyboy meets the 572xp
- Thread starter huskyboy
- Start date
andyshine77
Pinnacle OPE Member
- Local time
- 9:54 PM
- User ID
- 3830
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2017
- Messages
- 1,254
- Reaction score
- 5,630
- Location
- Cincinnati, OH
Based in my testing years ago, stock the 385xp was just a little ahead of the 7900 in 28" wood, so I do not see the 572 being equal or ahead of the 390, maybe in the dinky small wood I've seen the comparison in so far, but anything larger the 385/390, and 7900 will pull ahead, as they should.
Last edited:
andyshine77
Pinnacle OPE Member
- Local time
- 9:54 PM
- User ID
- 3830
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2017
- Messages
- 1,254
- Reaction score
- 5,630
- Location
- Cincinnati, OH
~WBF
Thecallofthewildanswered1989-2017[PAID IN FULL!]
I had more to post on the other thread you quoted me on about the 572 oiler output and the oiler you were thinking
you would check part # for compatibility.
It was pretty calculated with the reduced g&o so that's as as good as shaving weight of parts no doubt.
What is different about this oiler is it doesn't oil at idle. IDK any other Husqavna that has that? Must be activated by clutch engagement then at 3800 +/-100. Could be good could be bad...could prove to create accidents? IDK.
You can run it pretty high idle for extra liquid/air cooling too. That is my style, I like that. Should help calibration and response too. I could tell your saw stumbles on the low rev. The av's were shaking like f*. A high idle should that too? That looks like it may get to my hands? IDK? They say it calibrates 10 times quicker than any predecessors but I am not seeing that as yet?
Captain was saying his 562 was more responsive and better for limbing?
Longer stroke I guess. It's all good stuff.
Makes sense.
Optimal will be best on a square chain so you can limb with 'no rev' then.
Beautiful saw though. I would love to have one ported with square and get into some steady chewing in 4-5fters.
---
As you were saying on the other thread about clutch.
They didn't shave weight on the clutch so it could be the same. The flywheel is smaller and 30g lighter as you must know by the forestry.com launch write up you posted. I followed pretty close as things unfolded. So 30g of each side cover and 29g of the coil and 200g of the case.
Why the very heavy 'reenforced' muffler then?????. Reenforced for what? There has never been issues. They said this when they shaved the weight and it went to the muffler and bottom end.
It has to be for heat only???
Then they said they moved the handle bar back 10mm (1cm) for center of gravity.
Basically for a reenforced muffler that has never been needed before?
How ramped is the air flow?
Moondoggy said once he got a vented cover on his 562 it was sucking air in if you would believe it sir.
Be cool if a guy could get some kinda test.
you would check part # for compatibility.
It was pretty calculated with the reduced g&o so that's as as good as shaving weight of parts no doubt.
What is different about this oiler is it doesn't oil at idle. IDK any other Husqavna that has that? Must be activated by clutch engagement then at 3800 +/-100. Could be good could be bad...could prove to create accidents? IDK.
You can run it pretty high idle for extra liquid/air cooling too. That is my style, I like that. Should help calibration and response too. I could tell your saw stumbles on the low rev. The av's were shaking like f*. A high idle should that too? That looks like it may get to my hands? IDK? They say it calibrates 10 times quicker than any predecessors but I am not seeing that as yet?
Captain was saying his 562 was more responsive and better for limbing?
Longer stroke I guess. It's all good stuff.
Makes sense.
Optimal will be best on a square chain so you can limb with 'no rev' then.
Beautiful saw though. I would love to have one ported with square and get into some steady chewing in 4-5fters.
---
As you were saying on the other thread about clutch.
They didn't shave weight on the clutch so it could be the same. The flywheel is smaller and 30g lighter as you must know by the forestry.com launch write up you posted. I followed pretty close as things unfolded. So 30g of each side cover and 29g of the coil and 200g of the case.
Why the very heavy 'reenforced' muffler then?????. Reenforced for what? There has never been issues. They said this when they shaved the weight and it went to the muffler and bottom end.
It has to be for heat only???
Then they said they moved the handle bar back 10mm (1cm) for center of gravity.
Basically for a reenforced muffler that has never been needed before?
How ramped is the air flow?
Moondoggy said once he got a vented cover on his 562 it was sucking air in if you would believe it sir.
Be cool if a guy could get some kinda test.
Last edited:
~WBF
Thecallofthewildanswered1989-2017[PAID IN FULL!]
Thank you BTW.
You as well your friend Brad are a couple organization people.. I take my hat off.
Solid work as usual.
--------
He is talking about the front rib of the cover ahead of the front bar hole ..outer edge. Basically what is stoping it from fitting? If it is not that then it doesn't have room at the back? Quick mod?
huskyboy
Sorta a husqvarna guy...
- Local time
- 9:54 PM
- User ID
- 1352
- Joined
- May 30, 2016
- Messages
- 10,025
- Reaction score
- 43,462
- Location
- Ct
I thought taking off the captive nuts and running standard ones you’d be able to run a outside 372/390 dog? Or does the raised area in front of the stud not let you do that?
andyshine77
Pinnacle OPE Member
- Local time
- 9:54 PM
- User ID
- 3830
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2017
- Messages
- 1,254
- Reaction score
- 5,630
- Location
- Cincinnati, OH
Ok I see. Yes there is a large lip at the front of the cover that prevents the use of the dogs that fit on the bar studs. The dogs that fit the stock cover mount to the front of the cover itself.
andyshine77
Pinnacle OPE Member
- Local time
- 9:54 PM
- User ID
- 3830
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2017
- Messages
- 1,254
- Reaction score
- 5,630
- Location
- Cincinnati, OH
It does look like the dog would fit if you where to grind off the lip and use regular bar nuts.
Last edited:
Skeans1
Here For The Long Haul!
- Local time
- 6:54 PM
- User ID
- 6510
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2018
- Messages
- 1,711
- Reaction score
- 9,310
- Location
- Oregon
It does look like the dog would fit if you where to ground off the lip and use regular bar nuts.
So it’s like the 562, wonder if a 562 dawg is the same.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
andyshine77
Pinnacle OPE Member
- Local time
- 9:54 PM
- User ID
- 3830
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2017
- Messages
- 1,254
- Reaction score
- 5,630
- Location
- Cincinnati, OH
Yes like the 562, no idea if the spike who fit both covers.
andyshine77
Pinnacle OPE Member
- Local time
- 9:54 PM
- User ID
- 3830
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2017
- Messages
- 1,254
- Reaction score
- 5,630
- Location
- Cincinnati, OH
I have a 562 here, but no outer spike. Guess I could compare the covers. Measurements would be good too.[emoji111]
~WBF
Thecallofthewildanswered1989-2017[PAID IN FULL!]
Yeah but most want the bigger ones. .Cool if you could find out the 562 small ones fit though. . I love the dig dogs you made. They don't drop low like the AM pro safety's. Much better control. Nice job.Roughly 2 5/8” center
Stock on top, you’d need a set like I have on the 562 to fit that style of cover.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Skeans1
Here For The Long Haul!
- Local time
- 6:54 PM
- User ID
- 6510
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2018
- Messages
- 1,711
- Reaction score
- 9,310
- Location
- Oregon
Metals406 on AS cut them for me wish I could take credit for them but they work great. The small stock ones wouldn’t dig in the thick second growth fir bark we cut these will actually stick in the tree if you need to get up on a board which is a huge bonus.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
