You cut one axis of the graph off
The graph is just how I wanted....
Shows what needs to be shown. The difference
You cut one axis of the graph off
GotchaTop 3 are the 572, bottom 3 are the 7310 and the tq is the 6 lines towards the bottom.
Not satisfied with the dyno yet?
It is very repeatable. Just not sure if I can call it accurate yet. It is only using 10% range on the load cell. I am going to shorten the arm to 6% and use more range. Should give even higher resolution.
But both saws same day multiple runs. I am very confident in that comparison.
Both new?
First fire out of the box on both.
Cool!
7310 shouldn’t reach 13k. Box stock should be 12700-rich.
Factory data.According to?
Factory data.
That's exactly why I asked if it was box stock And if factory standard (emission compliant) setting is 12700 (12600-12800 to be precise), it's obvious with 13500 it is on a lean side.I don’t put much faith in factory data or specs.
If that was the case we wouldn’t mod saws.
That's exactly why I asked if it was box stock And if factory standard (emission compliant) setting is 12700 (12600-12800 to be precise), it's obvious with 13500 it is on a lean side.
Obvious? Are you at Joe's?That's exactly why I asked if it was box stock And if factory standard (emission compliant) setting is 12700 (12600-12800 to be precise), it's obvious with 13500 it is on a lean side.
Yep, just out of the box. Sure sounded plenty rich still. I'll have to read the Manual sometime lol
Obvious? Are you at Joe's?
View attachment 264153
View attachment 264155
1600 amps of buzz....
And a couple of wire feeders getting pulled out of the pig barn. Gotta knock the dust off and see if they work.