Woodslasher
Teh debil
- Local time
- 1:08 AM
- User ID
- 15993
- Joined
- Mar 18, 2021
- Messages
- 3,532
- Reaction score
- 14,410
- Location
- Commiefornia

....and?
I appreciate the thought, but that pic has stumped me and my family. According to that measurement, the conn rod is 7/8-15/16 wide but no conn rod I am aware of is that wide. The widest small end bearing I have is 7/10 or so which makes 9/10 sounds ridiculously huge. My dad fiddled with a set of our calipers for several minutes and none of us have any idea what that equates to in mm.Here ya go...@Woodslasher![]()
Okay. Do you have any idea what that equates to in mm? 15/16 sounds freakin' huge for a small end bearing but I have been known to be wrong.I measured both my 281 and 288 and both are the same.
It's not 15/16 it's close to 11/16.Okay. Do you have any idea what that equates to in mm? 15/16 sounds freakin' huge for a small end bearing but I have been known to be wrong.
Thank you, I need to find a piston with a 14mm conn rod width.It's not 15/16 it's close to 11/16.
You just helped my OCD immensely! I thought one just read the dial on the caliper but now I see the # on the shaft (7) is the first digit, and the # in the dial (~9) is the second digit, so .79. I was thinking it was reading .9 and the camera angle made it look like the shaft was at 7 and not 9..790”=20mm
Formula : multiply the length value by 25.4
What is that?
Thank you, I need to find a piston with a 14mm conn rod width.
You just helped my OCD immensely! I thought one just read the dial on the caliper but now I see the # on the shaft (7) is the first digit, and the # in the dial (~9) is the second digit, so .79. I was thinking it was reading .9 and the camera angle made it look like the shaft was at 7 and not 9.
This...[emoji115]It's actually 0.690" (17.52mm) as the hash mark for the 7 isn't exposed yet.