~WBF
Thecallofthewildanswered1989-2017[PAID IN FULL!]
Yes, that was just exactly my point.Not comparing the 572 to the 372, but to the 462. And yes, the larger tank gives the "impression" of better fuel economy (and I have no clue which one is better). Just sayin we should try to compare apples with apples, not oranges!
I knew what you meant but I was taking it back apples to apples.. I enjoy your knowledge and posts very much. Between you and Mason then the points made have always being very good. I am as neutral as can be. I think a can bring a few more things to the table from a 'matter of factfy' stand point. It doesn't change anything much at the end of the day or obviously I would have jumped in with a strong opinion one way or the other back some time ago.
I have done a lot of work by the piece in my time. I know that I like.
I wanted my 262 ported but Waller wouldn't do it because he salvaged the cylinder so he only ported my 42 and my 266
My first two ported saws in my life and I was just happy to get me 262 going again but was disappointed I couldn't run a ported saw.
What mattered was having the right saw in my hands for the right job..
And why did he port the 42??