High Quality Chainsaw Bars Husqvarna Toys Hockfire Saws

Show us your tractors

Matt Ellerbee

Pinnacle OPE Member
Local time
12:42 PM
User ID
2397
Joined
Jan 1, 2017
Messages
674
Reaction score
2,099
Location
Canton,Georgia
Country flag
4a97fa773287c19f660516adc376a57b.jpg

f8623a673efbcb8cdd00a9343aaf8ea1.jpg

3e1b4a1f5baf5896f3694482824427d1.jpg

Kubota LX2610 with larger R14 tires. I installed 3rd function for grapple. Works around my wooded 2 acres very nicely.
 

Ryan Browne

Pinnacle OPE Member
GoldMember
Local time
11:42 AM
User ID
1799
Joined
Sep 4, 2016
Messages
2,407
Reaction score
9,828
Location
Wisconsin
Country flag
Yeah a hydro is the best if available. Naysayers say use to much power. What tires do you have and do you mow with it? We have a smaller Ford to bushhog and hayrack.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

I have filled ag tires on mine. I run a 5' bush hog with it. Would rather have a twin spindle 7' or 8'. Mostly though I mow with a New Holland tc29d. About 24hp at the pto. Plenty for a 5' bush hog. That tractor doesn't have a loader, and it's unbelievably miserly on fuel, so it makes a great bush hogging rig.
 

Steve

Excellence!
GoldMember
Local time
11:42 AM
User ID
639
Joined
Jan 21, 2016
Messages
8,369
Reaction score
44,906
Location
Missouri
Country flag
I've had an MX4700 since the end of 2013. It's been flawless. Sometimes I wish we had a bigger tractor, but I've thought about adding a 70+hp old school ag or utility tractor if we ever really need one. My favorite aspect of the MX is the hydrostatic transmission. It really makes the tractor perform like a skid loader for our needs. It's not the same, I know, but the ability to place things super precisely with the pallet forks, or inch around spreading compost out of the bucket does the trick for us. I'm sure I'd get used to a bigger machine with a shuttle (especially a hydraulic shuttle), but the smoothness you can achieve on a hydrostatic machine after only 50-100 hours in the seat is pretty amazing. Also, I can put anyone who can drive a riding lawn mower on the thing and not worry about them driving through a building.

In my opinion, a hydro trans on a utility loader tractor is a must. If you do a lot of loader work it really shines. They do eat more power than a gear tractor but just get the biggest engine for the tractor chassis and you will still have extra power. We had a new holland 1925 with almost 4700 hours on it and the hydro unit was the strongest part of the tractor even after all the years and hours. We replaced it a few months ago on a new LS. Of course, with a hydro trans.

PXL_20201127_203530115.jpg
 

Steve

Excellence!
GoldMember
Local time
11:42 AM
User ID
639
Joined
Jan 21, 2016
Messages
8,369
Reaction score
44,906
Location
Missouri
Country flag
That a 30-35hp LS? That looks like a pretty useful bucket on that rig!

40hp. Largest engine on the MT2 series. I love that bucket. Really wanted a 5 foot bucket when I was tractor shopping but the LS had a 5.5' bucket. Now that I have it I'm glad I do! I really like how it curls all the way up at transport height. Everything stays in it.
 

Locust Cutter

Air Force Redneck
Local time
11:42 AM
User ID
387
Joined
Jan 3, 2016
Messages
2,288
Reaction score
7,662
Location
KS
Nice! Part of me really wants a 70-100 horse tractor for the additional capabilities. But, aside from occasionally moving a round bale, I intend it for more for firewood, bush hogs, and light tillage (gardens and such). And, I want to be able to transport it easily, and maybe have some room on the trailer (physically and weight-wise) for some wood too. The smaller foot print is also a lot easier navigating in tight spaces. I could live with a Shuttle Shift, but I'm pretty set on hydro, given the amount of loader work it'll be doing. I'll also have filled tires, wheel weights, and some sort of rear implement for additional weight/ballast... I think that MX6060, or something similar in the Mahindra or LS line may be it. I love Massey's, but the next one down from the 2607 is a much smaller tractor that costs about as much as the larger one.
 

Steve

Excellence!
GoldMember
Local time
11:42 AM
User ID
639
Joined
Jan 21, 2016
Messages
8,369
Reaction score
44,906
Location
Missouri
Country flag
Nice! Part of me really wants a 70-100 horse tractor for the additional capabilities. But, aside from occasionally moving a round bale, I intend it for more for firewood, bush hogs, and light tillage (gardens and such). And, I want to be able to transport it easily, and maybe have some room on the trailer (physically and weight-wise) for some wood too. The smaller foot print is also a lot easier navigating in tight spaces. I could live with a Shuttle Shift, but I'm pretty set on hydro, given the amount of loader work it'll be doing. I'll also have filled tires, wheel weights, and some sort of rear implement for additional weight/ballast... I think that MX6060, or something similar in the Mahindra or LS line may be it. I love Massey's, but the next one down from the 2607 is a much smaller tractor that costs about as much as the larger one.


I have the rear tires filled and use a 6ft cutter with this one. Handles 4x4 bales like they're air! Biggest issue is lifting height. I can't double stack on a trailer. That's where the bigger tractors shine.


20200930_140055_HDR.jpg
 

srb08

Doesn't play well with others
Local time
11:42 AM
User ID
1905
Joined
Sep 30, 2016
Messages
2,522
Reaction score
8,844
Location
Mid Mo
Country flag
Nice! Part of me really wants a 70-100 horse tractor for the additional capabilities. But, aside from occasionally moving a round bale, I intend it for more for firewood, bush hogs, and light tillage (gardens and such). And, I want to be able to transport it easily, and maybe have some room on the trailer (physically and weight-wise) for some wood too. The smaller foot print is also a lot easier navigating in tight spaces. I could live with a Shuttle Shift, but I'm pretty set on hydro, given the amount of loader work it'll be doing. I'll also have filled tires, wheel weights, and some sort of rear implement for additional weight/ballast... I think that MX6060, or something similar in the Mahindra or LS line may be it. I love Massey's, but the next one down from the 2607 is a much smaller tractor that costs about as much as the larger one.

I've got a little bare bones 45hp Mahindra. It's only six years old but has been a good tractor.
image.jpeg
 

Locust Cutter

Air Force Redneck
Local time
11:42 AM
User ID
387
Joined
Jan 3, 2016
Messages
2,288
Reaction score
7,662
Location
KS
@srb08 IF/when the A.F. lifts their 300 mile travel restriction for service members, I need to come visit some day. To check out your tractor, and your .450"+ diameter revolvers!! And, bring a toy or two with me for you to try!
 

Steve

Excellence!
GoldMember
Local time
11:42 AM
User ID
639
Joined
Jan 21, 2016
Messages
8,369
Reaction score
44,906
Location
Missouri
Country flag
@srb08 IF/when the A.F. lifts their 300 mile travel restriction for service members, I need to come visit some day. To check out your tractor, and your .450"+ diameter revolvers!! And, bring a toy or two with me for you to try!


Biggest perk of this community is the great people and you can damn near test any product in its natural environment because of the great people. No sales people, no regulations. Just may have to travel a bit, but in my experience it has always been a blast meeting anyone on this forum!
 

Locust Cutter

Air Force Redneck
Local time
11:42 AM
User ID
387
Joined
Jan 3, 2016
Messages
2,288
Reaction score
7,662
Location
KS
I think that my old F925 Deere had the same Yanmar engine that's in that 430. If so, beyond always running a bit warm with a clean radiator (blown out every mowing and washed out 4x a season), it ran great until the neighbor screwed it up. But, he could have broken an anvil...
 
Top