On 660 vs 661
A difference of 2mm in stroke change the bore and stroke ratio from :
660 : 54/40 = 1.35 ratio
661 : 56/38 = 1.474
From my exemple above we determined the best bore to stroke ratio is 1:1 .
Knowing these numbers it is evident that porting design and other factors impact much more final comportement of the saw than a variation of .124 in stroke ratio making it go from very very oversquare to very oversquare.
Low rpm ?
I would like to hear why you can't have a long stroke small bore saw to rev 13.5k . I have successfully built a saw with a 38mm stroke and 42mm piston holding 15000rpm in the cut with a 9 pin sprocket . Plans for this year are 16000 rpm 10 pin sprocket with a custom built CNC cylinder .
Also note that 125cc gp engines are 54mm bore and 54mm stroke and make close to 54hp at 13000rpm .
Why do they do chainsaws manufacturers do it ?
A bigger bore and smaller stroke makes for a more compact and light engine wich is why chainsaws are designed this way not for performance reasons.
On rod length
Rod length reduces piston friction that's one point but not the most important . There are two other aspects :
-Long rods increase ''dwell time'' at both ends of the stroke wich means more time for the mixture to burn .
-Transfers , due to their overall height and BDC position , are the most impacted by the increased dwell time . Meaning that for the same 120° of opening they will be opened for a longer period of time on a long rod motor than a short rod .
Now , we should also know that any well designed race engine is limited by the transfers . Makes sense now why long rods is superior everythingelse being equal ?
Great post
There where several stock production chainsaws with square motors
Including many of the earlier jonsereds
But my interest has been with the two saws listed below which have square motors and are at both ends of the RPM spectrum
Solo Rex 125cc 54mm x 54mm
Solo twin 100cc 40mm x 40mm
Two square engines from 50+years ago
The Rex will cut and chew through wood at 4K - 4.5k rpm and
The twin is at the other end proving that a square engined chainsaw can rev out and perform so well at that speed
Solo Super Rex 140cc 58 mm x 54mm. .??? Haven't used one yet
Solo twin 110cc. 42mm x 40mm if you cut into wood at 3/4 load then open that throttle too full load , go slap yourself f##### quick and hang on tight
The big twin reminds me of an bike I had in the late 80's
A Yamaha RD125 Twin awesome It had micron pipes tuned up to our road legal limits so loud it also had a square engine maybe 42 x 42 or 43mm x 43mm I think ??