- Local time
- 1:20 AM
- User ID
- 4
- Joined
- Dec 3, 2015
- Messages
- 50,014
- Reaction score
- 329,757
- Location
- Banner Springs Tennessee
I'm thinking more blowdown by raising the exhaust a little more. Crazy?
I may just widen the top part and then blend to the triangle bottom. Idk yet. Lol.
I'm not sure. It dosnt have the greatest transfers out there so I'm wondering if closing that intake down a tad earlier will help.I'm thinking more blowdown by raising the exhaust a little more. Crazy?
Ya just got some new into try. Got some morso/edelbrock 2 part that's supposed to be designed for there aluminum heads. See how it is compared to devcon.Worth a try and easy to undo.
Thanks man.I'm out bro.
We are gonna go crawl in a sweat lodge and melt our ears.
I'll ask the Creator about helping you out a little bit while I'm saying my prayers.
Both saws look gay, but saw two was certainly a lot stronger
it's more impressive when you actually use the saw like I think it should be. Much faster and torqueier when you using it for little stuff.
110/125/ and the intake I widened to 55% and just slightly blended down. Exhaust is 65% width. Muffler mod is just the tube removed with the front of the oem deflector opened up.
Saw #2 after running this one I'm not sure where I'm going add just a little more comp. I know that. I'm gonna shorten up the blowdown I know that. The exhaust I'm thinking of leaving it a tad lower and I'm really considering epoxing the intake. Maybe go with 112/124/75 with a normal square intake. Gain some more case compression.
That was more what I was thinking. Go to 105 or so.
No limbing saws here. We want pure grunt. Lol. This new saw is actually an older gentleman's that needs a light saw to do all his main cutting. So an 18" bar buried saw is what I'm after on his. May even see if I can add a decomp for him. They don't start all that hard but if I can make it easier I will. Now mine. It's all about the experiment.I was replying when you posted...definitely thinking higher exhaust and more blowdown will help! If he wants a limb saw, even taking it past 105 wouldn't hurt.
Well hello jj. Nope that's just some fine Japanese designing there.Did you get a wisdom tooth pulled?
would it make any difference if the cover was ground flat?Well hello jj. Nope that's just some fine Japanese designing there.
http://www.yamabiko-corp.co.jp/echo_global/products/category/contents_type=26
I understand that the 500P is basically the same as the 500ES. The newest entry in 50cc is the 500SX, that is listed with a somewhat decent power output.
The plastic looks and feels just as cheap and brittle though, with sharp corners....
I hope so cause this forum is where most of my posting will be. This will be home.Did you mean 501sx troll?
Carl looks like you got a little more play on this build over here than @ FHC. I'd be interested to see how echo squeezed the extra ponies out of that 501sx. Wonder of its got a flat top piston in it.
Epoxy that intake and make it as wide as you can.Ya just got some new into try. Got some morso/edelbrock 2 part that's supposed to be designed for there aluminum heads. See how it is compared to devcon.
I hope so cause this forum is where most of my posting will be. This will be home.
And an awesome home it's starting out to be. Thanks Bruce!
Epoxy that intake and make it as wide as you can.
See how it goes. Then like Mike was saying, raise ex in steps to find it's happy place..
Also, running .325 on a 20" bar is for smoothness in limbing, operator's convenience, and reach. Not speed for sure. The design sucks the power out of a saw, as it wallows in it's own debris, so it's hard to really narrow down improvements.
I like my 500P, but it sure ain't a speed demon.
Seems you got good torque gains out of victim #1 though.
Let's see some rpm's out of #2!