rattler
Here For The Long Haul!
Sorry Anthony I just dident think of it my apologies.Reason I wasn't invited? I live 30 mins from ya. Why didn't y'all come over.
Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
Sorry Anthony I just dident think of it my apologies.Reason I wasn't invited? I live 30 mins from ya. Why didn't y'all come over.
I have seen a few people ask how well they relate to each other. I'd like to start with 24" wood, most likely fir...then move on to larger wood 30",36", hopefully up to near 50" wood, to see what happens as the wood gets bigger. I know chain speed will be the deciding factor in the smaller stuff...larger stuff, I'd think, would be the more torquey setup.
It's ok Mike, apologize accepted.Sorry Anthony I just dident think of it my apologies.
Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
Qot
My cut and ported 394 would be no faster than my ported 357 in 16" wood, maybe even slower due to the fact the 357 is simply capable of higher RPM and thus chain speed. To really test the bigger saws you definitely want larger wood. Sugar maple aka "hard maple" is about the most dense and hard species of wood here in the Northeast, very tough wood to cut, split, and even handle due to it's weight. I ran my modded 394 with a 36" bar and 8-pin in roughly 36" hard maple to see what it is made of. I noodled with it and crosscut and it out-muscled a well ported 372 running a 24" and 7-pin in every possible way by a significant margin in the same log. When engine size goes up, test media has to go up with it to get the true picture.
Yes Sir it is you did a great job on that chain she was sharp.That saw is a runner. With a great chain it's super smooth.
Regardless of cut times you just cant deny the brute feel of a well done 2100.I have seen a few people ask how well they relate to each other. I'd like to start with 24" wood, most likely fir...then move on to larger wood 30",36", hopefully up to near 50" wood, to see what happens as the wood gets bigger. I know chain speed will be the deciding factor in the smaller stuff...larger stuff, I'd think, would be the more torquey setup.
I'm gonna start buying lotto tickets and if I win big I'm moving up around your area!I enjoyed it David you and the family come back anytime.
Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk
Regardless of cut times you just cant deny the brute feel of a well done 2100.
You're *s-wordtin me?! And you didn't take it home?!Hmm.....the junk pile I picked my 242xp out of last week also had what I think is a 2100...looked to be 100% complete, even has a 32" B&C
Going to directly compare the ported 395 when I get it back to the ported 394 I have. They even even impress stock. There is a reason husky has built same basic saw since '91 without replacing it.One of my plans at some point, is to get three huskies together for some fun cutting and side by side shootouts. Get all three ported, then do the same to see what kind of differences are made.
394/395/2100
Put a bigger sprocket on it with a short bar and u have a sick machine. 357 better pack a lunchQot
My cut and ported 394 would be no faster than my ported 357 in 16" wood, maybe even slower due to the fact the 357 is simply capable of higher RPM and thus chain speed. To really test the bigger saws you definitely want larger wood. Sugar maple aka "hard maple" is about the most dense and hard species of wood here in the Northeast, very tough wood to cut, split, and even handle due to it's weight. I ran my modded 394 with a 36" bar and 8-pin in roughly 36" hard maple to see what it is made of. I noodled with it and crosscut and it out-muscled a well ported 372 running a 24" and 7-pin in every possible way by a significant margin in the same log. When engine size goes up, test media has to go up with it to get the true picture. Fast is one thing, but having the HP to keep it fast under a heavy load dragging chain through 3 feet of hardwood is what separates the big dogs from everything else
Going to directly compare the ported 395 when I get it back to the ported 394 I have. They even even impress stock. There is a reason husky has built same basic saw since '91 without replacing it.
I had to have that 242xpYou're *s-wordtin me?! And you didn't take it home?!
Haven't run a Tree-90-Fo yet eh??395 is still my favorite saw.