Wonkydonkey
Plastic member
- Local time
- 4:10 AM
- User ID
- 3189
- Joined
- May 14, 2017
- Messages
- 5,146
- Reaction score
- 22,931
- Location
- Sussex, UK.

My question is……What does the 2stroke tuners hand book say about it 

Might be the curve of the port at the cylinder wall. Hard to see in 2D.
Thanks for sharing Randy....a couple things stand out when looking at this cylinder.
1) Staggered opening of the transfers with the intake side opening first. - would tend to help lift the charge upward
2) Upper transfer roof angle seems to point upward quite a bit - also would would push the charge upward
3) upper transfer height relative to the exhaust seems kinda low suggesting a good amount of blowdown...maybe it isn't as I'm not used to looking at a cylinder like this.
4) tapered squish band most likely employed to help push the charge upward toward the spark plug in the chamber
All this seems to point toward trying to make the engine produce power at a higher RPM vs. being a torque monster....at least that is how I would interpret what I am seeing.
I'm kinda surprised at the cross section of the intake port....near the boot it looks huge!
There was a local builder here who was angling his upper transfers in a similar fashion, and there's one for sure in Idaho currently doing it.
Are any of the OPE builders dressing their upper transfers in this way?
Opening the intake side of the upper transfers first doesn’t make sense to me. On the other hand, making the transfer roof blow upward can certainly help pick up some rpm, but at the expense of some low end grunt.There was a local builder here who was angling his upper transfers in a similar fashion, and there's one for sure in Idaho currently doing it.
Are any of the OPE builders dressing their upper transfers in this way?
Seems logical Kenny.I thought maybe the angle of the transfer made it cut downhill better.
Got me.
No. 661 is high on each end, and lower in the middle. 500i is highest on the exhaust side.Aren’t 500i and 661 transfers sloped upward toward the intake?
Perhaps an emissions or fuel economy thing?Every 2 port stihl I’ve seen opened intake side first. I figured they were giving the exhaust more time to get out before opening that side of the transfer port
I know Dean at Washington hot saws did that style of transfer ports on my 372xpg. I think Jason Egan is doing it too if I recallThere was a local builder here who was angling his upper transfers in a similar fashion, and there's one for sure in Idaho currently doing it.
Are any of the OPE builders dressing their upper transfers in this way?
Yeah, my thoughts were along those lines. EmissionsPerhaps an emissions or fuel economy thing?
It could also be because doing it that way tends to make them a little bit higher strung in my experience. Maybe that’s what they were afterPerhaps an emissions or fuel economy thing?