Wider = more power, more square at the top flows more at the 1st crack of the port?Let's talk a bit about EXHAUST now. Port placement, shape, pipes, etc....
I think more area=more power.Wider = more power, more square at the top flows more at the 1st crack of the port?
Corners of your exhaust are rounded nicely, should be fine. I wouldn't raise it anymore DocSo do I deal with this roof or raise it to a nicer arc?
Because of the smallish chamber, I believe I'm gonna raise it. This will also allow me to balance intake and exhaust durations.
I blended the squish to chamber interface quite a bit.
View attachment 12438View attachment 12439View attachment 12440View attachment 12441View attachment 12442
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
I cheated a bit Deets. Can you see it?Corners of your exhaust are rounded nicely, should be fine. I wouldn't raise it anymore Doc
A good plan before hand is wise. Jumping in and opening things up too much can go south quickly. Thats why I usually throw ideas around with Mdavlee, Randy, Shaun, etc. Thoso guys have explored options and can and do save a man time and money if a man will ask for help. I sure can appreciate your interest, studying, and knowledge also as u have gotten a good grip on all this stuff!! Thanks for sharing and Im listening!!Then there's the issue of compression. Let's say I cut too much from my band. I check and I'm at 250psi of compression. I can raise the ex port to bleed that off at starting RPM. If I make a pointier roof or a wider bevel, I'm varying the duration a bit because at higher rpm, it will start trapping before the defect in the plating or the very small arc on the roof is fully closed.
An exaggeration of this would be the old McCullough T port. I'm pretty sure Stihl still uses this design on its cutoff saws.
Looks fine to me as that peak will blowdown alil quicker and taper down without taking as much roof out down to the edges? Saves some compression? Also if u wanna peak quicker and want more compression, take alil less out of the passage to the exhaust Window?I raised the chamfer. So it's wider at the top and narrower at the edges.
The top of the chamfer is under the ring lip.
So the opening in the plating is slightly more arched in the center than the pics woul suggest.
I think I'm gonna raise it to 101.
U have a slight stepdown on the floor if my eyes are workin right?So do I deal with this roof or raise it to a nicer arc?
Because of the smallish chamber, I believe I'm gonna raise it. This will also allow me to balance intake and exhaust durations.
I blended the squish to chamber interface quite a bit.
View attachment 12438View attachment 12439View attachment 12440View attachment 12441View attachment 12442
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Plenty of arc in that roof ? Looks greatCorners of your exhaust are rounded nicely, should be fine. I wouldn't raise it anymore Doc
044 in front of me......
Man hangin a ring in a inake widened too much on a 460 is no fun either! Lol!! I found out the hard way!! U dont forget thoso kinda mistakes and learn quickly to measure/ calculate before widening!!From past experience of hanging a ring in the exhaust .............. I'd round out that roof just a little more.
If you hang a ring ........... you wont need to worry about how it performs