The tree is not dead no.This tree burned only from the other side?
The tree seems not so dead from the pictures
Here is a couple from today on the archie creek fireView attachment 258986 View attachment 258987
I think in many cases the built up areas happened in zones that previously were outside of the "danger zone" for hurricanes, storms, etc. Used to be only a once in 100 years storm would hit those areas, but now it seems to be annual. That's the effect of climate change.I was shaking my head watching comments on the news.
I'm trying to avoid talking politics, but it was like they were saying the last 4 years has created global warming and if someone else were in power they could stop it. That grown people who vote actually believe this scares me!
Excellent posts above, and I'm sure more housing in vulnerable areas is also a factor. It is similar to the hurricane comparisons, when there are far more structures in the way, there will be far more damage from similar storms.
Fort Bragg NC does an excellent job of doing what you stated in your bottom paragraph. Crews clean out and bale all the dead pine straw, fire teams conduct controlled burns in cleared areas, and huge firebreaks are maintained, several with geotextiles.Logging is part of the answer for sure, and so is re-introducing fire to the landscape in areas that were formerly prone to fire. The biggest problem right now isn't climate change, it's forest and land mismanagement. It started in the 60's mainly in California, where the enviro-whackos wanted everything locked up. They started suing anyone who wanted to log or cut trees, and then lobbied state government to enact legislation that made it very difficult for private landowners to log or do development on their own lands. That's the main key in the mega-fires they're having now. My good buddy went down and worked on the Edison right-of-way job for three years and he said there's hundreds of thousands of large legacy snags in utility and public right-of-ways because any kind of cutting was forbidden for three decades. Now they have such a problem, it's going to cost millions and take twenty years to address. In the mean time, we'll continue to have mega-fires and environmental groups like the Sierra Club refuse to take any kind of responsibility.
Another factor is fire suppression - we've helped create our own problem by putting out all fires for the preceding 120 years. If we had let some fires burn in the 30's-90's, we'd be a lot better off.
The answer is gonna be: 1. - Selective Logging and fuels reduction, 2.- Creating more broad-scale fuel breaks where wildland interfaces with developed/urban areas, 3.- Running more controlled fire through the landscape, 4.- Really educating landowners on appropriate/responsible land management.
This tree burned only from the other side?
The tree seems not so dead from the pictures
Edit: I saw the rest of ur pic, so from this side it looks a lot worse
Wow, just looked up the Stihl brochure, that's an amazing saw! If I ever need another big saw I would definitely be looking at one of those.Pulls a 36 with authority
Wow, just looked up the Stihl brochure, that's an amazing saw! If I ever need another big saw I would definitely be looking at one of those.
Whats the blue saw
7:00 that evening I saw a tanker flying to big creek because of a fire at Camp Sierra, it was holding at 1 acre with crews hiking in then at 11 things went sideways. At midnight I was hualing ass up to the beaver slide on highway 168 to get eyes on what was happening.
Crowning fire running hill towards Huntington lake road.
View attachment 259159
View attachment 259160
View from the cabin at meadow lakes. 9am.
View attachment 259161
Tankers 912 and 944
View attachment 259162
View attachment 259163
Whats it go like . Noticed them and been curious how they performZomax 6010.