- Local time
- 12:04 PM
- User ID
- 325
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2015
- Messages
- 4,747
- Reaction score
- 24,081
- Location
- Centre County

Nice! How many DL on the chain for the Fat Belly Bar?
I'll have to count again but I think I remember it being something like 76.Nice! How many DL on the chain for the Fat Belly Bar?
To be honest they felt about the same. I had to time them to tell the difference. The 461 has a tad more off idle torque, but once you spin up the 46 it has about the same torque. I wouldn’t sell either one to buy the other put it that way.Nice vids and saws Mason.
Which saw felt stronger?
Which saw felt faster?
Both looked good, but I would go with the 046 personally.
To be honest they felt about the same. I had to time them to tell the difference. The 461 has a tad more off idle torque, but once you spin up the 46 it has about the same torque. I wouldn’t sell either one to buy the other put it that way.
Its the quad port vs dual port.To be honest they felt about the same. I had to time them to tell the difference. The 461 has a tad more off idle torque, but once you spin up the 46 it has about the same torque. I wouldn’t sell either one to buy the other put it that way.
She's a ripper for sure!
You have a great new saw there Mike! CongratulationsHooray 446 hybrid
Sounds like a good plan to meIts the quad port vs dual port.
They both sounded strong.
Maybe you need to get that 046 Arctic MMWS'd. LOL
We can compare the 046s next time we meet. Use same bar and chain same wood deal and time the cuts.
All in the name of chainsaw science. LOL. [emoji106]
Nothing against the 462, but I think that a 70 cc saw cutting 5” pine doesn’t give me a good idea of the saws potential. I’d give it a good go in the wood I was cutting with the 461/46.A 462 video I found. Note the lack of spikes. Lol