Thanks Jeff. Thats a keeper recipeNice job Austin!
Tank ya Mason! Less BD, Lower EX, Shorter intake. Experimenting with modding a Chinese Zama C3M copy. Drilled out the main and that was it. You could probably hear that rich bog in the beginning of the video, low end was still a touch bit rich.You did more or less BD? Nice runner bud.
Both mine are unported and not machined ,but I did use a pop up in my 066 with a bgd. I feel like the same treatment for the 394 would make it out perform the 066 for long bar fun.My 394 after some port. No machine work for the sake of science to compare to my 660.
For sure it would.Both mine are unported and not machined ,but I did use a pop up in my 066 with a bgd. I feel like the same treatment for the 394 would make it out perform the 066 for long bar fun.
I’ve had saws beat or at least match other saws with less compression. It’s only one piece of the puzzle imo.My 394 after some port. No machine work for the sake of science to compare to my 660.
I intend to test the overall power output unlike how the the near stock 394 allegedly beat a certain 288. It was hardly a fair review of that 288. I just want to see how much power a 394 actually can have without machine work.I’ve had saws beat or at least match other saws with less compression. It’s only one piece of the puzzle imo.
Think you’re missing my point perhaps. No big deal. Makes sense to me.That depends entirely on how good the porter is imho. Nothing to do with the saw.
Also Buckin’s 394 was far from stock. He said it was walkerized a long time ago. So he’s a liar.Think you’re missing my point perhaps. No big deal. Makes sense to me
Exactly my pointAlso Buckin’s 394 was far from stock. He said it was walkerized a long time ago. So he’s a liar.
If a 660 or 288 beats a 394 there’s something wrong with it. Not even a question that needs to be addressed imo. Lol