- Local time
- 2:44 PM
- User ID
- 522
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2016
- Messages
- 4,079
- Reaction score
- 26,801
- Location
- Iowa City
Frequency filtering is not my area of expertise. Any chance you could help me out there?
I think though we can wait and see if mechanical improvements help out first -- would really cool if we didn't need to filter and just bin the datapoints collected into various RPM ranges and plot from low to high w/ points that fit in each range averaged. A plot of resulting points may end up looking really nice. I can make the software do it automatically (like folks have done manually by reading a scale at various RPMS dialed in with the value) and make the range of each bin adjustable -- to try 50, 100, 200, 250 rpm ranges. I've got plenty of resolution on both RPM and load cell to do this. I'm going to also make the RPM display interval independent of RPM collection interval -- the display updating every 10th second is good but I can collect RPMs more often then that now that I have more pulses per rev and no reduction ratio robbing of resolution.
Also Shaun I'm very happy that the 16 pulses per rev on the hardware encoder interface on the beaglebone computer keeps up no problem w/ shaft spinning at saw RPM rate. My RC filter for noise is good through ~15000 hz frequency so no problem there.
You could do a low pass filter (RC filter) on the the load cell as well before or after the amplifier, it would need to be around 100Hz or so.