High Quality Chainsaw Bars Husqvarna Toys Hockfire Saws

Part One: The Exhaust Port

XP_Slinger

They’re Just Saws
Local time
5:56 PM
User ID
845
Joined
Feb 9, 2016
Messages
6,089
Reaction score
27,548
Location
Central NY
Country flag
I think you are giving it a smaller area to vent when it first opens. Yes it's flat but not near enough area I think
What I was thinking is make the flat your target opening number. Not raising the flat beyond your desired port height.
 

XP_Slinger

They’re Just Saws
Local time
5:56 PM
User ID
845
Joined
Feb 9, 2016
Messages
6,089
Reaction score
27,548
Location
Central NY
Country flag
On a 7900 I've got to tear down several that my loggers have ran the piss out of. On this particular saw. This is what I like. And remember I build these differently per the customer. but the ones that seem to run the best and wear great. Are like the left pic and I'll explain. The right pic is more arched with straighter side walls making for a huge exhaust. But has a nice curve so not to hang a ring. But both let's say 70% width. The left one is super flat on top but then has a big corner that drops a a steeper arc to mid port. This style seems to flow just as well but not pit as much skirt wear on. The bigger the port seems to really wear on the bottom of the skirts faster.

Thoughts.?
Apologize for the pics as the suck. But hopefully I got what I was trying to say across. lol. View attachment 68359
That makes a lot of sense. Gets the flat advantage without risking a snag. Thanks for sharing
 

Motorhead

Cantre Member
Local time
5:56 PM
User ID
215
Joined
Dec 24, 2015
Messages
3,410
Reaction score
14,434
Location
Tampa Fla.
Country flag
Ok fellas, bear with me on the drawing as I'm not the artsy type. But, anyone try a shape like this? Would give a flat area for rapid release of pressure and potentially better scavenging vs an oval but the ring would be safe. Not as optimum as flat all the way across but maybe a way to get part of the flat advantage. Justathinkin on this flat thing and the idea popped in my head
View attachment 68356
Home lite has that on a 410
 

CJ Brown

I learned it from a hockey card...
GoldMember
Local time
5:56 PM
User ID
2704
Joined
Feb 26, 2017
Messages
1,054
Reaction score
3,902
Location
Belleville, Ontario, Canada
Country flag
You would loose compression and ring seal
Well what I mean is, stay within your timing and width numbers with the edge of the bell. Your port area at exit of the cylinder would actually decrease, then increase as you traveled further towards the muffler flange.

I am just trying to relate what we did porting v8's 30 years ago. Exhaust ports in those engines would neck down just above the valve then widen as you traveled further towards the port exit. The thinking at the time is gasses do not like sharp turns, and even though the the port was a bit smaller above the combustion chamber, the flow was actually greater than if you simply ran the port straight out from the chamber. Think of the 3 or 5 angle valve job, with the angles blended for smoother flow.
 

EvilRoySlade

What’s my line?
Local time
5:56 PM
User ID
959
Joined
Feb 27, 2016
Messages
1,044
Reaction score
4,647
Location
Michigan
Country flag
I have a few angles on this as I learn.
1) if you could design your own cylinder for any saw using the stock crank and piston, would any of you have target numbers, angles, volumes of ports. It's many steps backwards in the design but essentially it's what we are doing.
2) An engineer I believe would decide on certain goals and try to achieve them. Production is much different than play as we all know. So...peak torque at 9k or 12k, torque peak spanning 700rpm or 3k rpm.

I know those are general and all encompassing but it comes back to the exhaust;
As many have stated it varies by engine size, to connect with others comments I believe it's very much crank angle/cylinder volume/corrected compression ratios. It's been stated already but there has to be enough of an explosion to drive the piston down but only until the crank has passed an angle that the rod isn't needed as much for all of the leverage, that should be when the port opens. Now... if you can tell me the common denominator, I will tell everyone you're a solid fella.
 

EvilRoySlade

What’s my line?
Local time
5:56 PM
User ID
959
Joined
Feb 27, 2016
Messages
1,044
Reaction score
4,647
Location
Michigan
Country flag
Well what I mean is, stay within your timing and width numbers with the edge of the bell. Your port area at exit of the cylinder would actually decrease, then increase as you traveled further towards the muffler flange.

I am just trying to relate what we did porting v8's 30 years ago. Exhaust ports in those engines would neck down just above the valve then widen as you traveled further towards the port exit. The thinking at the time is gasses do not like sharp turns, and even though the the port was a bit smaller above the combustion chamber, the flow was actually greater than if you simply ran the port straight out from the chamber. Think of the 3 or 5 angle valve job, with the angles blended for smoother flow.

I agree with this, gas doesn't follow sharp angles without disruption.
 
Top