I’m in the camp of matching my chain to wood type. I wish I could run square but it would be dull way too quick for the type wood I cut. I would like to think there is video of a self feeding chain somewhere in wood just as petrified as that stuff you got down under, but maybe not. The moisture content of that log looks the be in the negative
1+ Understanding the saw output, fiber to be cut, dryness of fiber, and the tooth/raker relationship took me a few years to grasp.
For hardwoods, a square profile will have a more efficient bite than a round profile, thus to the operator it will seem like the saw performs better/smoother.
Another concept that took me a while to realize is the importance of torque, something that our good friend Steve
@Stump Shot lectured me over and over again. That concept became very clear when I had the 550 MK2 SSS torque monster 20" 325 square profile cutting a log just as yours, bone 7 year dry and knotty all over the place. Full bar in and I could not stall her. Let go of the throttle mid way, and she picks up right away.
That is not to say that a round profile cannot cut equally well.
I had a 5 year old Bolivian Cherry, that is some very hard wood to cut.
Only about 10" log, I had the T540 MK2 build by our good friend Mark
@Crocky28, 043 325 round filed, I was taking the saw and chain to its limits, eliminating some build in safety features.
I was not ready, the saw bit in and almost left my hands. Glad I was wearing my full protective gear on that one.
No stalling on this one either, let go mid cut and she picks right up.
Both square and round profiles performed well in my dry woods, it all depends on what the operator prefers to run.