With the combination of high-temperature strength, sufficient stiffness and very low density, shouldn’t magnesium be a popular piston material? The most important reason why we don’t use it is its low thermal conductivity – it has around 60% lower thermal conductivity than 2618, which means that without considerable effort put into cooling, the magnesium piston will tend to run much hotter than its aluminium counterpart. This degrades performance, as some of the heat in the piston will be rejected to the incoming fresh charge, raising its temperature and lowering volumetric efficiency in the process,
I assumed it has the same crank as the 462 since it has the same stroke.Maybe extra cooling explains the extra weight, because in my mind if the piston is lighter than a 362, the crank+rod can be lighter, so the saw should be lighter (the other components do not weight as much).
A lighter piston is pretty much always better, and Strato pistons tend to be quite a bit heavier than non Strato pistons, so this should help that. Although I never had any complaints with the first generation 362 I owned. Well the air filter was pretty horrendously design.I was speaking in general terms. Sorry if I am confusing anyone...
I think that is what Stihl was getting at...lighter weight, and a bit softer material...
Yeah what's that all about?PS. Just looking out for you.
Don't ask for air filter pics!!!
Figure something like that.[emoji44][emoji2357] Oh no...