dall
Mastermind Approved!
- Local time
- 7:06 PM
- User ID
- 795
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2016
- Messages
- 48,770
- Reaction score
- 201,572
- Location
- grafton wv

Back yard back dooris someone gonna jump on this?
Same thing
Both are wide open spaces
Back yard back dooris someone gonna jump on this?
Idk, you gotta ask him.Is that what they call it now?
The zero sounds great until you have to divide by it. 180 degrees between freezing and boiling makes lots of sense. Metric is almost always the wrong size for measurements. 1.85 meters, 185 centimeters, either too big, or too small. 6 foot 1 inch is easy.We started our day at 0c and may hit 7c. Yes, I used the metric as is what world does 32 make more sense than 0 to define the same thing?
@MastermindIdk, you gotta ask him.
The first time I heard about the new flat earthers I thought it was just kinda a jokePlus flat Earth and stuff.
harshStay offa muh fughin lawn.
100 degrees between freezing and boiling makes a lot of sense too, Measurements is actually where metric really starts to shine, why use two different units of measure to define the total? 6 ft 1 inch is incredibly more complex, to say or to calculate with. Measuring mm is much simpler than fractions, everyone hates doing math with different denominators.The zero sounds great until you have to divide by it. 180 degrees between freezing and boiling makes lots of sense. Metric is almost always the wrong size for measurements. 1.85 meters, 185 centimeters, either too big, or too small. 6 foot 1 inch is easy.
What about MILS or MOA?100 degrees between freezing and boiling makes a lot of sense too, Measurements is actually where metric really starts to shine, why use two different units of measure to define the total? 6 ft 1 inch is incredibly more complex, to say or to calculate with. Measuring mm is much simpler than fractions, everyone hates doing math with different denominators.
I know we won’t agree and what you are used to is what you will prefer. I’m lucky I grew up as Canada was converting I can operate equally well in either but for many things Metric is clearly superior.
And yet you see even more negative Celsius temperatures.don’t know about where you live but where I am and @Loony661 and the rest of the MN and WI crew see far too many negative Fahrenheit numbers every winter.
100 degrees between boiling and freezing makes zero sense at all when boiling and freezing change infinitely with pressure and elevation. The reference points make no sense, therefore, Celsius is stupid. That's why they tried to adopt Kelvin. The reference points for Fahrenheit are not freezing and boiling.100 degrees between freezing and boiling makes a lot of sense too, Measurements is actually where metric really starts to shine, why use two different units of measure to define the total? 6 ft 1 inch is incredibly more complex, to say or to calculate with. Measuring mm is much simpler than fractions, everyone hates doing math with different denominators.
I know we won’t agree and what you are used to is what you will prefer. I’m lucky I grew up as Canada was converting I can operate equally well in either but for many things Metric is clearly superior.
Don't kid yourself.Metric is clearly superior.
Zero C is frozen.100 degrees between boiling and freezing makes zero sense at all when boiling and freezing change infinitely with pressure and elevation. The reference points make no sense, therefore, Celsius is stupid. That's why they tried to adopt Kelvin. The reference points for Fahrenheit are not freezing and boiling.
Standard units have more arbitrary numbers, get used to it, arbitrary numbers are everywhere in science. Who decided the charge of an electron was -1.6x10^-19 Coulombs? Why is a mole 6.022×10^23? The natural world doesn't work in multiples of 10. What difference is it if the units do?
Don't kid yourself.
Mornin John! We drop a few trees and log em out today, then our holiday dinner as well.Test day here at the carpenter academy. Early quit here then next door to our district council building for a holiday luncheon.
I do agree that metric has its place. Where imperial shines is in common use. The relationships between fluid measurements is much easier. Teaspoons, tablespoons, cups, pints, quarts, gallons. Liters per 100 km's is one of the most retarded ways of measuring anything. Do you guys put liter consumption gauges in your cars. My odometer and calibrated fuel pump is all I need to get accurate mileage readings. Science stuff is ok. Daily, not so much.100 degrees between freezing and boiling makes a lot of sense too, Measurements is actually where metric really starts to shine, why use two different units of measure to define the total? 6 ft 1 inch is incredibly more complex, to say or to calculate with. Measuring mm is much simpler than fractions, everyone hates doing math with different denominators.
I know we won’t agree and what you are used to is what you will prefer. I’m lucky I grew up as Canada was converting I can operate equally well in either but for many things Metric is clearly superior.
Mils any day. The relationship is perfect. Moa is ofter misquoted and not as precise. I believe 1 moa is 1.07" at 100 yards. Not a big deal at 100 yds, but at 100 miles...What about MILS or MOA?