mTronic replacement for the 291 or 311? Kind of a weird middle ground.53,2 cc
3,3 kW/4,4 PS
4,85 kg
Looks like a case bolt under the muffler.mTronic replacement for the 291 or 311? Kind of a weird middle ground.
mTronic replacement for the 291 or 311? Kind of a weird middle ground.
I also congratulate Stihl on coming up with a sensible model number system. 300, 400, 500i. So simple.Even though I'm a Husqvarna man, I just have to congratulate Stihl on a very exciting chainsaw in the 50cc class.
It's a shame they called it the 300, if you search on Google you'll mostly get the MSA 300 which is battery junk.
The only downside I can see is the vibration level, I've seen slightly different numbers than posted here, 4.2 on both handles is a lot for my elbows.
It's unfortunate Stihl didn't expand their FI line with the 300C.Even though I'm a Husqvarna man, I just have to congratulate Stihl on a very exciting chainsaw in the 50cc class.
It's a shame they called it the 300, if you search on Google you'll mostly get the MSA 300 which is battery junk.
The only downside I can see is the vibration level, I've seen slightly different numbers than posted here, 4.2 on both handles is a lot for my elbows.
So…the price of used 261s just went up? Sweet!Oh christ...here comes the cost predictions again...
I bet it will be thirdy two hundwed dollers.
3,5 and 4,2 are the numbers published by StihlEven though I'm a Husqvarna man, I just have to congratulate Stihl on a very exciting chainsaw in the 50cc class.
It's a shame they called it the 300, if you search on Google you'll mostly get the MSA 300 which is battery junk.
The only downside I can see is the vibration level, I've seen slightly different numbers than posted here, 4.2 on both handles is a lot for my elbows.




