I haven’t done any testing. Out of the box, The difference between .325 .063 RS and .325 .050 RSP is like night and day. Not a test, just the wow factor.2013 pic of RS. I noticed that weird grind right away.
View attachment 230014
View attachment 230013
It's like a little bump half way up the side plate. What stands out to me is the tremendous "beak" and the slim raker. New Husky chain is similar.
DW, have you ran those 2 back to back?
It's not. The RS has always had compound duplex angles. On this new RSP, they are more exaggerated, and to my thinking, effectiveI didn't realize that this cutter design profile was a prototype out in 2013 either...
And . . . are you going to share it?I saw an answer to a FAQ from Stihl about not being able to duplicate factory tooth profile long before RSP became available.
I guess what I meant was they said in FAQ:And . . . are you going to share it?
If there are advantages to this type of 'scalloped' cutting edge, we should be able to 'imitate' it to some extent, using multiple passes with a grinder or file, or with a profiled grinding wheel. But it would help to know what we are trying to achieve.
Philbert
Its way less exaggerated (than RSP)and as soon as you file it, gone in several strokesHmmm. I never noticed that profile on my RS chains. Maybe I got older stock? [emoji848]
I don't buy that answer. (theirs, not yours).I guess what I meant was they said in FAQ:
“yeah, you cannot do what we do because what we do is done before assembly “
Phillbert, Next time you have a pile of "rocked" chains to grind, Try not to dress or true up the grinding wheel.And . . . are you going to share it?
If there are advantages to this type of 'scalloped' cutting edge, we should be able to 'imitate' it to some extent, using multiple passes with a grinder or file, or with a profiled grinding wheel. But it would help to know what we are trying to achieve.
Philbert