Lightning Performance
Here For The Long Haul!
- Local time
- 1:12 PM
- User ID
- 677
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2016
- Messages
- 10,991
- Reaction score
- 28,057
- Location
- East of Philly
Proportion valve was wrong and they sucked on my 83 s10 to. Changed it to over to 1978 Monte carlo proportion valve, problem solved. Worked well up to 130 mph. No more scaring people while city driving with rear wheel lock ups. Stock brakes handled nice. The Inline four cylinder automatic was swapped to a 350/7004R or R4 the second time. It was fast and stopped, well. It need to. The first beast engine swap was a nasty lil 327/350 500+hp 3500 stall. It was just too much for the street without wheel tubs and tires. Blow the tires of at sixty in second gear on a hot sticky night. No contest on cold roads and triple digits, the tires lost that battle. It was cool for for two weeks like that on race gas 11.8-1 compression ratio. The brakes always worked better with that update even with power brakes and that no vacuum signal motor. It idled @ 9 psi vac lol. Had a big Holley to. Guys did it to other small trucks. It just worked.Reading your first post the 100k on the drums sounds about right. My little d21 Nissan still has the original shoes/drums at 120k. But still shouldn’t be spongy. Heck we had the opposite problem with our 90s chevys (s10/cavaliers) if we did aftermarket shoes on them they would grab like crazy at low speeds. Only the rear grabbed though. Didn’t bother us enough to change them though lol.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Road test time with rear brake pinched off at the hose. Maybe get some good feedback, I hope. *f-wording hate daily driver vehicles