I thought that was only 362s but you are probably right. Was it a year split?Some 365s had a bolt on intake boot as well.
Meteor kits are good. A friend of mine used a Hutzl top end and it’s still going strong. Some guys frown upon using the ultra cheap stuff like Hutzl but the bottom line is they run and I know I can’t always afford an OEM top end. If you have the ability to refine them a little by way of cleaning up casting slag or sometimes adjusting port timing you can get good power out of them.Can anyone recommend a good aftermarket top end for a 372?
One of my favorite builds and well worth it.The 51.4mm (75cc) XPW top end can be swapped onto an OE 372 and the XT. My brother @XP_Slinger swapped an XPW top end onto his XT successfully earlier this year.
If I used a AM cylinder would I be better off using a quality piston or no
Good point Bob, I've heard that about the rings and lower grade plating in some of the AM cylinders. I personally don't prefer to mix n match piston and cylinder brands. Not based on any negative experiences, I just like to keep the parts "Matched" when I can whether they are aftermarket or OEM. The only exception to this is I would have no reservation about using a Meteor piston in an OEM cylinder because of Meteor's reputation for quality. Something I may have to do in the future on my recently aquired 394.AM piston in an OEM jug can be a good idea, but not the other way around, so that's kind of going in the wrong direction IMO. Quality piston on top of buying the AM kit adds up to where you're not really saving much. And there's some consensus here that the better quality, harder rings are not a good match for the plating on many AM cylinders.